General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can anyone point out any substantive criticism of Pelosi? [View all]Bucky
(55,334 posts)I admire Clinton for her years of service to the country, but she couldn't have provided herself as a better punching bag for the misogynistic right-wing smear machine.
She has a talent for saying snarky or sarcastic things at the wrong moment. She's not a compelling politician. And Republicans have spent a quarter of a century trashing her. Clinton is a excellent administrator, but a piss poor politician. She simply doesn't have the natural talent for persuasion or the charisma or the ethos that Nancy Pelosi brings to the table.
Pelosi suffers mostly from spillover misogyny targeted at Clinton, and the fact that she's from San Francisco. But when you see her speak, she's sincere, direct, and compelling. She won't be the same Bette Noire that Clinton presented.