Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(18,486 posts)

23. I don't understand your question

Sat Feb 13, 2021, 08:20 PM

Feb 2021

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So next up: Schumer was talking about invoking the 14th amendment [View all] Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 OP

Needed the conviction in order to proceed? soothsayer Feb 2021 #1

No. triron Feb 2021 #3

yes qazplm135 Feb 2021 #8

Reich is wrong StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #10

Yes, we need to go there... Trueblue Texan Feb 2021 #12

So if i understand you right bluestarone Feb 2021 #11

Yes. StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #13

TY! bluestarone Feb 2021 #15

Pipe Dream sfstaxprep Feb 2021 #2

+1 myohmy2 Feb 2021 #4

It's a pipe dream because the Constitution doesn't permit it StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #20

Disqualification From Federal Office Is Small Potatoes? sfstaxprep Feb 2021 #22

It is for him StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #24

Not according to Robert Reich: triron Feb 2021 #16

And SCOTUS has said that they will not be involved. Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #18

This is a different issue. The Supreme Court WOULD get involved StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #19

So you're saying SCOTUS will get involved if charges are found Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #21

I don't understand your question StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #23

I don't understand all that is going on and am trying to piece it together Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #25

unless he's convicted in a trial qazplm135 Feb 2021 #6

It's over. WarGamer Feb 2021 #9

I don't think it's going to happen BannonsLiver Feb 2021 #14