Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hueymahl

(2,892 posts)
128. Oh boy - - How the Faction LOVES this story
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 12:38 PM
Jan 2019

So great to have an excuse to bash AOC. The real facts don't even matter.

So Hilarious!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good for AOC. triron Jan 2019 #1
Not really. Cha Jan 2019 #54
Well, it is more important to me to point out ALL the GOP who voted "no" Their constituents who allgood33 Jan 2019 #63
what the...? D_Master81 Jan 2019 #2
The bill contained funding for ICE, which she opposed. LonePirate Jan 2019 #3
That's a bad reason to vote no. marylandblue Jan 2019 #4
That is a fair bet DFW Jan 2019 #9
I think you're right NewJeffCT Jan 2019 #14
Then why did she vote for basically the same language a week ago? onenote Jan 2019 #18
Almost every bill ever voted on in the history of America would have at least one thing Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #30
Not according to this screen - "Except funding for DHS", under which is ICE. George II Jan 2019 #48
From Roll Call: George II Jan 2019 #74
With a name like that, you must be familiar with the royal "we"...lol tritsofme Jan 2019 #108
She may be a very ineffective Representative SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #154
And it really doesn't matter how YOU feel about how she voted Ferrets are Cool Jan 2019 #5
Her vote does affect everyone though nini Jan 2019 #10
a difference that makes no difference is no difference shanny Jan 2019 #53
Exactly (and true for all in Congress). Besides DU is here spooky3 Jan 2019 #101
Well, yes, it does, actually. DFW Jan 2019 #13
What a bizarre thing to say. onenote Jan 2019 #19
Wait until primary season is in full tilt if you want to see bizzarre. nt Blue_true Jan 2019 #60
Not even VAGUELY how it works. Codeine Jan 2019 #27
Wrong. This has to do with the whole country. Cha Jan 2019 #39
Yea, it dors matter. Adrahil Jan 2019 #51
It's funny how it fluctuates between... doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #58
What "fluctuates"? George II Jan 2019 #71
People's reasons for disliking her or complaining about here doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #92
So you're okay with a Democrat voting against her party in an important vote? George II Jan 2019 #100
Again..... doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #105
I've never heard anyone say "it was symbolic" about anyone but one other member... George II Jan 2019 #109
Really? melman Jan 2019 #113
Please point me to one. Thanks. George II Jan 2019 #116
Nope melman Jan 2019 #118
Neither am I. I reiterate my original statement on this. George II Jan 2019 #120
Okay melman Jan 2019 #122
If anyone is truly interested... doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #127
Yeah melman Jan 2019 #132
Hahaaaaaa.. Cha Jan 2019 #155
What? melman Jan 2019 #159
lol Cha Jan 2019 #160
Okay melman Jan 2019 #162
Manchin's yes vote on Kavanaugh doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #125
Did he say either was "symbolic"? George II Jan 2019 #134
No, many posters on here did. doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #138
Kavanaugh doompatrol39 Jan 2019 #115
Not that long ago at all melman Jan 2019 #123
Hell of a huge difference between the discussion on Munchin and AOC. Autumn Jan 2019 #130
No kidding. Lots of doublethink and duckspeak today. n/t Decoy of Fenris Jan 2019 #135
It's hilarious and yet so sad. Autumn Jan 2019 #141
"Sad" is too tame. Pathetic, really. I pity them. n/t Decoy of Fenris Jan 2019 #142
Pathetic is a better word but I have no pity. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #150
To each their own. Good to see you again. I'm out, though. n/t Decoy of Fenris Jan 2019 #151
Take care, It was good to see you too. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #152
Why all this "whataboutism"? So if Manchin voted against the Democrats that means.... George II Jan 2019 #161
You mean like if AOC voted against the Democrats on a bill that was going to pass Autumn Jan 2019 #163
low bar Cha Jan 2019 #164
Yes melman Jan 2019 #136
It only matters when... Autumn Jan 2019 #139
What evidence do you have that her constituents share her views pnwmom Jan 2019 #69
So your representing here that she has no aspirations beyond her district. Cary Jan 2019 #76
Her constituents elected her to enact policy Takket Jan 2019 #78
We no longer know why she voted "No" three times yesterday, her only explanation.... George II Jan 2019 #114
So that Instagram "poll" she took asking if she should focus on constituent services or national iss Empowerer Jan 2019 #121
So all the people who complain about random Rs Loki Liesmith Jan 2019 #89
I guess no one should discuss the members of Congress unless they are from their respective states still_one Jan 2019 #137
Get over it pecosbob Jan 2019 #6
Amazingly INAPPROPRIATE analogy Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #29
+1 2naSalit Jan 2019 #56
+1 violetpastille Jan 2019 #85
I stand with AOC!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #46
So do I... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #79
Precisely... once again, AOC is mentoring her colleagues on how to bring progressive issues InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #83
So why did she vote FOR the same bill a week ago? onenote Jan 2019 #145
+1 sheshe2 Jan 2019 #153
Oh, really. How are the two votes equivalent? n/t pnwmom Jan 2019 #67
Let's not turn this into an argument when none is necessary pecosbob Jan 2019 #70
Chalk it to inexperience Apollyonus Jan 2019 #7
If Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #31
When she sees members voting no on proposals she supports because of one thing in a larger bill onenote Jan 2019 #8
I suspect she knows that already. DFW Jan 2019 #11
Not sure being an effective member of Congress is her goal GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #65
Bad move, youthful ignorance beachbum bob Jan 2019 #12
Good move, youthful courage. pwb Jan 2019 #17
So was it a bad move when she voted for basically the same bill a week ago? onenote Jan 2019 #21
However she votes I am fine with it. pwb Jan 2019 #23
That's a discerning attitude onenote Jan 2019 #34
God help us if there are very many new D seat holders who think they can ONLY vote on perfect bills Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #41
Really? No matter what? Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #35
Make that 1000%!!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #47
My support is coupled with "zero fucks" about the vote. David__77 Jan 2019 #50
That sounds really familiar Empowerer Jan 2019 #73
That's an "orange" way of thinking... tritsofme Jan 2019 #110
+1 shanny Jan 2019 #55
Wonderful! David__77 Jan 2019 #15
What is wonderful about it? Exactly? did she or you think perfect bills exist? Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #36
She met her constituents needs without jeopardizing the outcome. Kick the jukebox already. TheBlackAdder Jan 2019 #87
OK, so what you are saying is IF the vote was close she would NOT vote this way, and you know this Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #124
I get the idea of meeting her constituents needs (although many here don't apply that same test onenote Jan 2019 #144
With all due respect, how do we know this? sheshe2 Jan 2019 #165
She voted with 193 Republicans? NT WeekiWater Jan 2019 #16
And her organization is targeting Harry Cuellar? George II Jan 2019 #24
JD...some of us said what was what but we get shouted down. I got tired of sounding the warning Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #37
Congressman Cuellar did vote to open the government Gothmog Jan 2019 #40
This nt Watchfoxheadexplodes Jan 2019 #88
This blow by blow commentary on a junior MyNameGoesHere Jan 2019 #20
This is a pretty significant vote, though, and she is the lone dissenter. I usually Squinch Jan 2019 #32
Tiresome? How so? From what I can tell (and based on the boasting of her supporters)... NurseJackie Jan 2019 #33
The country is reeling with the government shutdown. In fact she just used the shutdown.... George II Jan 2019 #43
"essentially voting "with" them is not good." --- My feelings exactly. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #93
Two of their founders, Saikat Chakrabarti and Corbin Trent, are her two top aides... George II Jan 2019 #97
I didn't know that her TWO top aides were founders of Cenk Uygur's "Justice Democrats". That is... NurseJackie Jan 2019 #99
This is here first significant vote that we are all anticipating 2naSalit Jan 2019 #57
Well I have heard she is the Future treestar Jan 2019 #81
Ironically, when it comes time to determine the most liberal reps, this vote will hurt her. aikoaiko Jan 2019 #22
Exactly. During the 2018 primaries we saw a lot of criticism of incumbents who did not... George II Jan 2019 #25
For this session, Progressive Punch now rates her at #214 (tied) in the House at 96.43 George II Jan 2019 #49
As well it should. OilemFirchen Jan 2019 #61
For whatever reason, even if it's not valid. George II Jan 2019 #68
WTF? That's not good. Squinch Jan 2019 #26
Oh good lord! NurseJackie Jan 2019 #28
The BEST we can conclude is she mistakenly believes she will only vote on perfect bills. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #38
10 Republicans voted for this bill Gothmog Jan 2019 #42
That "1" looks terrible on that screen of the tally..... George II Jan 2019 #45
Oh wow.. ICE isn't even "Closed"?! Cha Jan 2019 #52
I don't know if they're closed or not, but one of the bills voted on yesterday.... George II Jan 2019 #166
So her no vote to not fund ICE was a mistake? brush Jan 2019 #59
I'd like to know why she voted Cha Jan 2019 #62
Me to. I hope we're not looking at just a contrarian here... brush Jan 2019 #64
It looks Cha Jan 2019 #158
I thought she wanted to be more than Bernie Jr. PubliusEnigma Jan 2019 #44
DU does not represent Democrats as a whole. GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #66
The reason given for the "No" vote isn't correct. We've heard that the "No" vote was because... George II Jan 2019 #72
"Some pretty important funding in that bill, but no DHS or ICE." -- Wow! NurseJackie Jan 2019 #96
I respect her decision. Joe941 Jan 2019 #75
You respect her decision to vote to keep the government closed? George II Jan 2019 #98
She is her own person and I respect that she can make her own choices. Joe941 Jan 2019 #117
With that in mind, how do you feel about Justice Democrats targeting Harry Cuellar next year? George II Jan 2019 #119
I dont know what it will take to get people to open their eyes to what is going on. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #129
And this is why the Republicans love her. R B Garr Jan 2019 #147
Watching Jake Tapper on CNN right now, and something I've been afraid of is happening.... George II Jan 2019 #156
Isn't there a weird strategic move... forgotmylogin Jan 2019 #77
By general rules of order I believe one must vote in favor to later move to reconsider WheelWalker Jan 2019 #82
You're right, it's the other way around. forgotmylogin Jan 2019 #86
She voted for the same bill a week ago. onenote Jan 2019 #143
I'm starting to think the attention treestar Jan 2019 #80
This message was self-deleted by its author LongtimeAZDem Jan 2019 #84
OMG! Let's primary her and elect more Retrumplicans! maxrandb Jan 2019 #90
Her district is not at all likely to elect a Republican. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #94
Bullshit maxrandb Jan 2019 #103
Nobody is attacking anyone. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #104
If you're not doodling her name over and over with hearts around it in your notebook EffieBlack Jan 2019 #106
Oh, well that's DIFFERENT! NurseJackie Jan 2019 #107
Correct, DIRECTLY due to people DEMANDING purity. And yet this vote is EXACTLY that. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #131
Or elect someone who reliably votes Democratic....oh wait.... OnDoutside Jan 2019 #102
Let's not get hyperbolic. Cha Jan 2019 #157
Nevertheless, she persisted IronLionZion Jan 2019 #91
The comparison with Senator Warren doesn't really work in this case. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #95
In voting with Republicans...what a proud moment... tritsofme Jan 2019 #111
There was another vote today in the House regarding funding the government. It passed with.... George II Jan 2019 #112
My thoughts - OhZone Jan 2019 #126
Oh boy - - How the Faction LOVES this story hueymahl Jan 2019 #128
What are the REAL facts? Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #133
Oh Facts matter.. a lot. Cha Jan 2019 #146
I agree - Don't understand why she voted against the bill that did not fund ICE hueymahl Jan 2019 #148
Not delighted. the opposite. Why vote with Cha Jan 2019 #149
Who cares...we have more to talk about than this one rep titaniumsalute Jan 2019 #140
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: On today's Hous...»Reply #128