Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Apologies to President Trump BY SHARYL ATTKISSON [View all]
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/435552-apologies-to-president-trumpWith the conclusions of special counsel Robert Muellers probe now known to a significant degree, it seems apologies are in order.
However, judging by the recent past, apologies are not likely forthcoming from the responsible parties. In this context, it matters not whether one is a supporter or a critic of President Trump.
Whatever his supposed flaws, the rampant accusations and speculation that shrouded Trumps presidency, even before it began, ultimately have proven unfounded. Just as Trump said all along.
Yet, each time Trump said so, some of us in the media lampooned him. We treated any words he spoke in his own defense as if they were automatically to be disbelieved because he had uttered them. Some even declared his words to be lies, although they had no evidence to back up their claims.
We in the media allowed unproven charges and false accusations to dominate the news landscape for more than two years, in a way that was wildly unbalanced and disproportionate to the evidence.
We did a poor job of tracking down leaks of false information. We failed to reasonably weigh the motives of anonymous sources and those claiming to have secret, special evidence of Trumps treason.
As such, we reported a tremendous amount of false information, always to Trumps detriment.
And when we corrected our mistakes, we often doubled down more than we apologized. We may have been technically wrong on that tiny point, we would acknowledge. But, in the same breath, we would insist that Trump was so obviously guilty of being Russian President Vladimir Putins puppet that the technical details hardly mattered.
So, a round of apologies seem in order.
However, judging by the recent past, apologies are not likely forthcoming from the responsible parties. In this context, it matters not whether one is a supporter or a critic of President Trump.
Whatever his supposed flaws, the rampant accusations and speculation that shrouded Trumps presidency, even before it began, ultimately have proven unfounded. Just as Trump said all along.
Yet, each time Trump said so, some of us in the media lampooned him. We treated any words he spoke in his own defense as if they were automatically to be disbelieved because he had uttered them. Some even declared his words to be lies, although they had no evidence to back up their claims.
We in the media allowed unproven charges and false accusations to dominate the news landscape for more than two years, in a way that was wildly unbalanced and disproportionate to the evidence.
We did a poor job of tracking down leaks of false information. We failed to reasonably weigh the motives of anonymous sources and those claiming to have secret, special evidence of Trumps treason.
As such, we reported a tremendous amount of false information, always to Trumps detriment.
And when we corrected our mistakes, we often doubled down more than we apologized. We may have been technically wrong on that tiny point, we would acknowledge. But, in the same breath, we would insist that Trump was so obviously guilty of being Russian President Vladimir Putins puppet that the technical details hardly mattered.
So, a round of apologies seem in order.
This is complete garbage. I'm fearing we are losing in the media.
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well they should wait to print that until after the report comes out, lest they'll have to do it
UniteFightBack
Mar 2019
#4
Sharyl Asskisson shouldn't be taken as representative of "the media."
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#7
We're not losing, it's just going to take longer than a couple of days because we need to get the
coti
Mar 2019
#9
Sinclair Broadcasting never said a bad word about tRump for the entire period. No need to apoligize.
PeeJ52
Mar 2019
#11
This passage from her Wikipedia bio contains anything anyone would need to know about her.
Different Drummer
Mar 2019
#15
Sorry, but there were NO UNFOUNDED accusations. Every accusation had an underlying Trump tweet,
allgood33
Mar 2019
#19