NO WONDER no charges filed for conspiracy... or collusion, whatever they call it.

[anarch]

7. not a lawyer, but the sense I get is that yeah, they're saying this specific crime can't be proved

beyond a reasonable doubt. Which is of course not to say "there's no evidence" or "it didn't happen" etc.

By simple logic, this can almost certainly be attributed at least in part to the successful obstruction of the investigation by Individual 1 and his accomplices. Evidence regarding such obstruction, if I understand correctly, was then intended to be presented to congress for their consideration as to whether it constituted sufficient reason to take further action, etc.

The AG then interjected himself into the whole process and came out with his pronouncements, and frankly I'll be amazed if anything we don't already know about gets exposed in whatever actually gets released to the public from the SCO report.