General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't know what the fuck to believe anymore about the Assange case. [View all]tama
(9,137 posts)only after if he or she continues after being made aware of 'no'. Or if you are not in position to say no (drugged unconscious, threatened, blackmailed etc.). In both cases, yours and SW's, you woke up in to full consciousness from sleep or slumber to the to the sexual initiative and had opportunity to reject the initiative, but chose not to. So the maker of the initiative had no reason to suspect or believe that the initiative was unwanted or rejected at the time - potential post-fact future regrets are immaterial. Court that decides the case makes it's decision after hearing both sides and inquiring the states of minds of both sides, not just the accuser. For crime to happen the court has to establish that there was also criminal intent (not taking no for answer or denying the ability to say no) on the side of the accused.