Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(92,187 posts)
6. It is telling poor women under Medicaid that if they are carrying a fetus with a birth defect,
Thu Jun 6, 2019, 09:48 AM
Jun 2019

termination of that pregnancy won't be covered by Medicaid. There more reasons then just rape, incest, or the life of the mother.

Of course people with means do not have to worry about this. This is directly against poor women

There are also other Democratic candidates running who are for the repeal of the Hyde Amendments. In fact I would say most if not all of the remaining candidates would be for its repeal. From what I am seeing, Joe is the odd man out on this.

This is an issue about discriminating against poor women, many who are minorities. It isn't an issue of if it will affect his poll numbers or not, it is what the right thing to do is.

If this was about segregation, would that be "acceptable"?

Because this is about segregation

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't mind Joe's stance...»Reply #6