Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Julian Assange asylum: Ecuador is right to stand up to the US (The Guardian) [View all]Cleita
(75,480 posts)24. Cleita said his problem is that he is gay?
Cleita never said that it was his problem. You are an awful person Atomic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Julian Assange asylum: Ecuador is right to stand up to the US (The Guardian) [View all]
Bonobo
Aug 2012
OP
And you would be well-served to stop being led by your nose by the powers that be.
Bonobo
Aug 2012
#20
Reread the OP, dear. It is ABOUT why it was correct for Ecuador to do as it did.
Bonobo
Aug 2012
#58
It's an opinion piece, not scripture from the lord god on high for crissakes.
AtomicKitten
Aug 2012
#61
Lol, but ever-changing allegations of rape, by an attorney with an agenda despite denials
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#70
Bradley Manning witnessed war crimes, torture to be specific. He tried reporting them
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#37
Manning's problem is he is a whistle blower and the US no longer protects Whistle Blowers
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#32
Well if this is never interacting, I don't think that word means what you think it means.
AtomicKitten
Aug 2012
#31
Sweden has a history of violating their own laws in regard to suspects wanted by the US..
Fumesucker
Aug 2012
#16
If Sweden was not violating their own laws then why the diplomatic crisis when they stopped?
Fumesucker
Aug 2012
#28
It really doesn't matter, these points have all been gone over ad infinitum. Clearly
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#29
Why would he 'stand trial for rape', when he has not been charged with that or any other
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#35
there is the MAIN barrier that if at the end of the interview the decition is to arrest
Bodhi BloodWave
Aug 2012
#72
Again, that is not a barrier to questioning him. As a member of the EU Sweden has
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#75
Only problem with that is, Sweden destroyed its reputation when it did the US a favor
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#25
There are no rape charges. There are no charges, period. You are losing credibility
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#36
What crime would they have charged him with two years ago, before the Grand Jury was even seated?
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#39
For someone who just got here, I would think you would refrain from making assumptions
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#43
He can be interviewed in London, they have refused to do so. End of story. The ball was
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#48
Thank you for chiming in. You were the person I was thinking of I believe who
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#50
I don't know any 'die-hard' Assange supporters. I do know, mostly Progressive Democrats,
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#57
Excellent article btw. It points out some very obvious facts about this 'case':
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#71