Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
70. Lol, but ever-changing allegations of rape, by an attorney with an agenda despite denials
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 12:58 PM
Aug 2012

by the women that there was rape, one of them so upset when she realized her questions had been turned into rape allegations, she refused to speak to the police again, forensic evidence that appears to have been manifactured, online messages between the women joking about 'making money from this'. Acknowledgement from the prosecutors and the women's attorneys, that this is a 'very weak case' and so much more. All of that is 'gospel' not just 'opinion'!

And now some more false allegations introduced, which goes to show that even if this case is dropped, again and he is cleared completely, there will be more attempts to 'get him' until the political climate changes as it will eventually, and justice becomes important again and rape is not used as a political tool to destroy someone.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks. Really too tired to read it tonight. Cleita Aug 2012 #1
K&R'd snot Aug 2012 #2
Assange needs to be tried vigier Aug 2012 #3
Welcome to DU! Fumesucker Aug 2012 #4
Swedish extradition process vigier Aug 2012 #5
Thank you for your post. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #6
Julian Assange is connected with Bradley Manning. Cleita Aug 2012 #7
Yes, we do. Both men have a problem with women. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #8
True. Cleita Aug 2012 #9
oh vigier Aug 2012 #10
I understand he would agree as well as the rapee Cleita Aug 2012 #11
Several things come to mind. Savannahmann Aug 2012 #53
That's not his problem; the problem is that he hits women. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #12
Sorry Kitty, but you are out there. Cleita Aug 2012 #13
Well, bye then. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #15
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #63
No matter what one's views, your attack was uncalled for. randome Aug 2012 #64
One might credibly call you a torture apologist... Bonobo Aug 2012 #14
Well that would be a fun leap in logic, wouldn't it? AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #18
And you would be well-served to stop being led by your nose by the powers that be. Bonobo Aug 2012 #20
Your parsing of rape charges is done within a cult of personality. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #26
You have it bass ackwards. Bonobo Aug 2012 #30
Your strawman challenge is completely irrelevant. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #33
Oh dear... Bonobo Aug 2012 #47
Bless your heart. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #51
There are no rape charges. Not hard to ignore something that doesn't exist. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #55
Reread the OP, dear. It is ABOUT why it was correct for Ecuador to do as it did. Bonobo Aug 2012 #58
It's an opinion piece, not scripture from the lord god on high for crissakes. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #61
Apparently you could not find a sock large enough. Bonobo Aug 2012 #62
Lol, but ever-changing allegations of rape, by an attorney with an agenda despite denials sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author Bonobo Aug 2012 #22
Bradley Manning witnessed war crimes, torture to be specific. He tried reporting them sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #37
Manning's problem is he is a whistle blower and the US no longer protects Whistle Blowers sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #32
wow dsc Aug 2012 #17
wow indeed, try reading that again AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #19
Cleita said his problem is that he is gay? Cleita Aug 2012 #24
Well if this is never interacting, I don't think that word means what you think it means. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #31
Manning struck his superior officer, who was a woman... SidDithers Aug 2012 #66
It is hard to stretch that to being a problem with women dsc Aug 2012 #73
Fair enough... SidDithers Aug 2012 #76
Sweden has a history of violating their own laws in regard to suspects wanted by the US.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #16
Sweden is known as being USA's Bichon Frise to our State Department. n/t Cleita Aug 2012 #20
... vigier Aug 2012 #23
If Sweden was not violating their own laws then why the diplomatic crisis when they stopped? Fumesucker Aug 2012 #28
It really doesn't matter, these points have all been gone over ad infinitum. Clearly sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #29
Why would he 'stand trial for rape', when he has not been charged with that or any other sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #35
why do you keep asking that question? Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #60
+1,000,000...nt SidDithers Aug 2012 #68
And that was incorrect information so why do you keep repeating it? sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #69
there is the MAIN barrier that if at the end of the interview the decition is to arrest Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #72
Again, that is not a barrier to questioning him. As a member of the EU Sweden has sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #75
Only problem with that is, Sweden destroyed its reputation when it did the US a favor sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #25
... Cleita Aug 2012 #27
... vigier Aug 2012 #34
There are no rape charges. There are no charges, period. You are losing credibility sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #36
... vigier Aug 2012 #38
What crime would they have charged him with two years ago, before the Grand Jury was even seated? sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #39
... vigier Aug 2012 #40
Funny how Stratfor's importance has been diminished suddenly. Emails from sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #42
... vigier Aug 2012 #44
There are no rape charges! sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #45
... vigier Aug 2012 #41
For someone who just got here, I would think you would refrain from making assumptions sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #43
... vigier Aug 2012 #46
He can be interviewed in London, they have refused to do so. End of story. The ball was sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #48
Welcome to DU! Your insistence on objectivity is always welcome. randome Aug 2012 #49
Thank you for chiming in. You were the person I was thinking of I believe who sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #50
Uh, 'finally'? I'm hardly the only person who thinks Assange is a jerk. randome Aug 2012 #54
I don't know any 'die-hard' Assange supporters. I do know, mostly Progressive Democrats, sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #57
I assure you I am not 'die-hard' anything. randome Aug 2012 #59
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #56
K & R malaise Aug 2012 #52
Correa made the ethical decision & I support him. nt TBF Aug 2012 #65
Unrec...nt SidDithers Aug 2012 #67
Excellent article btw. It points out some very obvious facts about this 'case': sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #71
How give credit for standing up to the US? treestar Aug 2012 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Julian Assange asylum: Ec...»Reply #70