Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
69. From an article written by Cass Sunstein,
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:21 AM
Sep 2012

the administrator for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs:

What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do,
what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1)
Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind
of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government
might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy
theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in
counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such
parties, encouraging them to help. Each instrument has a distinctive set of potential
effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions.
However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration
of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5).


"COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=281170&mesg_id=281170

"There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'
If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'
A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com ) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'

Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'
Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'
Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'
Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'
It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only the . sendero Sep 2012 #1
bullshit. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #52
I know plenty about it. sendero Sep 2012 #65
My comment has to do without you baseless judgment of other people. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #80
If you admittedly know nothing of the facts of the case, why are you judging the opinions of others? leveymg Sep 2012 #111
Wrong. Completely wrong. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #160
+1000 DeSwiss Sep 2012 #162
the sad truth is that allegations based on sex are destructive and are Swagman Sep 2012 #279
du rec. Nt xchrom Sep 2012 #2
Nope. Not enough credible evidence fredamae Sep 2012 #3
Not this liberal. ananda Sep 2012 #4
Thank you. A well-written piece. nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #5
What article did you read? whistler162 Sep 2012 #151
"god of the hour"??? Matariki Sep 2012 #203
I don't see liberals here believing them. woo me with science Sep 2012 #6
you point out some important truths about DU and society in general. iemitsu Sep 2012 #58
From an article written by Cass Sunstein, OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #69
thank you for providing the evidence to support my claim. iemitsu Sep 2012 #90
Very important information. Thanks for posting it. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #96
Wonderful post, OnyxCollie. Really hit it dead-center. leveymg Sep 2012 #117
Conspiracy theories exist because the official explanations no longer make sense. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #126
"When it can be established OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #127
Oh, but didn't you know, that's conspiracy theory. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #133
Democratic Underground, LLC is impervious to such infiltration. OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #138
This needs a thread of its own to make sure more people see it. 1monster Sep 2012 #157
I posted it in GD a couple weeks ago. Got locked and told to take it to Creative Speculation. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #169
Thank you. nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #183
+1 HiPointDem Sep 2012 #125
Exactly. But be careful calling the astroturfers astroturfers. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #64
They are here, woo me with science Sep 2012 #186
Well said. And your observation is worth repeating. Please let me borrow a portion: AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #98
don't forget supporting the nuclear power industry. iemitsu Sep 2012 #163
No, sorry, that's a pretty stupid assertion, I'm afraid. Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #129
An excellent post. Rape apologia requires a lot of explanation, though, which is why msanthrope Sep 2012 #148
And it has not occurred to you that there is available evidence in this case which sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #172
That's nice, congratulations Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #187
Oh please. woo me with science Sep 2012 #194
He is not charged with or wanted for rape. You still are not in possession of the facts sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #196
No, I am in possession of the facts Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #207
Obviously you are not in possession of the facts. He is wanted for QUESTIONING. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #209
He is not "wanted for questioning" Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #210
He is wanted for questioning. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #213
No, he is not merely "wanted for questioning". Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #216
"... In the Swedish system formal indictment takes place at a very late stage in proceedings, struggle4progress Sep 2012 #225
Again he is wanted for questioning, that is all. There are no charges filed. I am well sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #229
... In this matter, the prosecutor’s deliberations resulted in a request for the detention struggle4progress Sep 2012 #244
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #223
and yet they will relentlessly say otherwise fascisthunter Sep 2012 #171
Not this Liberal either. 99Forever Sep 2012 #7
Just the opposite... SidDithers Sep 2012 #8
not ignoring them Enrique Sep 2012 #18
I ignore nothing-but focus fredamae Sep 2012 #29
Pesky liberals and their support of whistle blowers. rhett o rick Sep 2012 #40
There are no sex charges against Assange. That is why Liberals sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #79
Take it up with the OP... SidDithers Sep 2012 #115
Then why did not correct it? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #135
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #265
Is that your experience in Canada? Are liberals in Canada the same as liberals in the US? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #104
... SidDithers Sep 2012 #109
There are no sex charges against Assange. How often do you need to be sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #200
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #266
Hero worship gets in the way of a rational discussion of this. randome Sep 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author marmar Sep 2012 #10
So does strident labeling of anyone who questions the charges as being afflicted by "hero worship" marmar Sep 2012 #11
Not at all. randome Sep 2012 #13
If Assange "steps out" in Sweden, he could be "Siegelmann"'d Doctor_J Sep 2012 #23
After two years of letting him play the appeals process for all it was worth... randome Sep 2012 #25
Nothing has changed because of Assange?? Doctor_J Sep 2012 #30
No nothing, and giving him credit for every single thing that happened treestar Sep 2012 #191
There are a few countries in this world that would totally disagree with you on that. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #234
Assange "stole"??? 1monster Sep 2012 #45
I suppose the correct statement is that Manning stole the documents. randome Sep 2012 #83
Oh, so now you are condemning him for NOT stealing. 1monster Sep 2012 #159
Not at all. How could you interpret it that way? treestar Sep 2012 #192
"letting him play the appeals process for all it was worth" JDPriestly Sep 2012 #53
Is breaking the terms of his bail part of the process, too? randome Sep 2012 #54
Purely silly treestar Sep 2012 #190
Narcissism isn't against the law in any country, as far as I'm aware. If the women themselves 1monster Sep 2012 #31
Exactly. The world is watching. randome Sep 2012 #35
President Obama dosen't flinch at "taking out" actual and supposed enemies and 1monster Sep 2012 #42
Yes, justice is always up to us. randome Sep 2012 #48
You know what? I don't care what you think. Especially since you are using 1monster Sep 2012 #63
Have you a link for "has refused to cooperate with the Swedish police", please? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #108
Its been a while since I read it, but will try to find it for you... 1monster Sep 2012 #168
Opening Post, second paragraph 1monster Sep 2012 #174
That's just an American writer claiming it, in an opinion piece muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #175
You still haven't read the damned police interview protocols, have you n/t reorg Sep 2012 #176
Yes, I did (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #178
Apparently, Sweden is a unique jurisdiction...a person reports acts, and then msanthrope Sep 2012 #180
And being a narcissist means he is a rapist. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #47
I asked you before but you have not answered: Where do you see this hero-worship, and who sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #99
+1000! eom BlueMTexpat Sep 2012 #32
How else to explain an utter inability to distinguish the treestar Sep 2012 #189
What are you talking about? Repetez en anglais, s'il vous plait. marmar Sep 2012 #198
And who would be these 'hero worshippers' you speak of? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #85
I agree liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #144
Nope. Unless of course you automatically believe that women lie about assault. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #12
Red herring and diversion. ananda Sep 2012 #14
You're not denying the charges? You just think he should get a free pass? randome Sep 2012 #15
TYFYC. nt valerief Sep 2012 #60
You're welcome. randome Sep 2012 #67
Why, if they have a case, have they not filed it? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #82
So you're saying that this grand conspiracy against Assange... randome Sep 2012 #84
I stated a fact. There are still no charges against Assange after two, long years where it was sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #88
You already know the answer to that. randome Sep 2012 #93
And you already know that this excuse has been debunked over and over again. Even they sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #95
So the conspirators leave that big a hole in their plans? randome Sep 2012 #100
Resorting again to personal attacks, but you still have not answered the question nearly sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #105
I don't think I added 'personal attacks' to my arguments. randome Sep 2012 #113
It is not correct to say that Sweden could not arrest someone in London. They are a member sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #110
He was arrested for return to Sweden, though, isn't that it? randome Sep 2012 #114
Um, a Swedish court has ordered his arrest: the Swedes want him back in Sweden to arrest him struggle4progress Sep 2012 #253
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list Vi struggle4progress Sep 2012 #267
Lies, lies and lies are all you are offering. Assange was cleared and allowed to leave 1monster Sep 2012 #34
Assange left Sweden the day before his scheduled interview with the prosecutor hack89 Sep 2012 #240
Assange had no scheduled interview with the prosecutor. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #286
No - the lawyer admits under oath that he lied before hack89 Sep 2012 #290
I don't care what the lawyer did. You made the false claim that Assange had sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #293
There was a scheduled appointment - the lawyer admits to it. hack89 Sep 2012 #297
"... In cross-examination the Swedish lawyer confirmed that paragraph 13 of his proof of evidence is struggle4progress Sep 2012 #251
Well, if he had run, you would have a point. But he did not run. In fact he went to the police sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #92
The Assange defense lied about that in UK court, and the UK court caught them lying: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #252
The defense did not lie, the defense like many defense attorneys do every day sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #289
Assange's attorney admitted to the court he had made untrue claims -- yet you repeat those claims struggle4progress Sep 2012 #294
What the lawyer and the prosecutor did is not relevant to what Assange did. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #296
No, I believe a woman when she says 'there was no rape'. Why would anyone not believe her? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #97
"The other woman wanted to report rape. I gave my testimony to support her story" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #276
God damn it ! THERE ARE NO CHARGES ! Swagman Sep 2012 #282
There is a valid arrest order from a Swedish court, which has withstood several appeals struggle4progress Sep 2012 #295
Glad you brought up the 'valid arrest warrant'. There is doubt as to whether that arrest sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #298
The matter's been litigated thoroughly in both the UK and Sweden. The Swedish court's arrest order struggle4progress Sep 2012 #299
The matter of the legitimacy of the warrant has been raised and has not been litigated sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #300
Warrant validity was the central topic in the UK cases. Assange lost. The cases are here: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #301
It has not been litigated in Sweden. The issue has been raised in Sweden and sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #303
K&R Cleita Sep 2012 #16
Only the ones without critical thinking skills. nt Comrade_McKenzie Sep 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #19
Only the liberals who have OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #20
Not this liberal... AnneD Sep 2012 #21
Ha! Rove? randome Sep 2012 #37
Need to read the link.... KoKo Sep 2012 #38
Sorry. randome Sep 2012 #43
Yes, Rove, glad you brought it up. Rove has been, oh so coincidentally, in the background sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #101
I hear he's related to Kevin Bacon, too. randome Sep 2012 #103
Let me try again to keep this discussion on an adult level. Why has the prosecutor sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #106
Got any evidence of that? I'm sure you are not trying to be funny since you apparently take sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #107
I think nothing of Rove, the criminal 'mastermind' behind Palin, Romney & Akin. randome Sep 2012 #120
So you believe that he is a war criminal. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #128
LOL!... SidDithers Sep 2012 #118
Not everywhere, but definitely and coincidentally in Sweden at just the 'right' time. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #231
Rove and his dirty tricks..... AnneD Sep 2012 #228
If you remember he was being questioned by Congress for his role in the firing of the US sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #232
That will be one... AnneD Sep 2012 #233
Some of our peeps are a little like the Dittiots Doctor_J Sep 2012 #22
From someone whose favorite group is the gungeon! valerief Sep 2012 #61
An ad hominem fallacy is the best that you've got? That's it? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #102
Yeah, a poll in gungeon wouldn't be biased. valerief Sep 2012 #132
Selection bias in that poll. ElboRuum Sep 2012 #302
I miss UnRec krawhitham Sep 2012 #24
Yes. a2liberal Sep 2012 #26
It's one of the easiest ways to manipulate liberals. The Doctor. Sep 2012 #27
and I seriously doubt they are liberals fascisthunter Sep 2012 #28
If there are two 'sides' to the Assange story... randome Sep 2012 #36
Invectives such as "rape apologist" you mean? nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #41
'Rape apologists'. randome Sep 2012 #46
"Rape apologist" is more offensive than any of the ones you listed. Bonobo Sep 2012 #50
There are invectives from both sides, I agree. randome Sep 2012 #51
Yes there are two sides and it's not the liberal side that wants rhett o rick Sep 2012 #44
This liberal does not want to 'lynch' anyone. randome Sep 2012 #49
Then we agree. However, in an earlier post I believe you called him rhett o rick Sep 2012 #81
The Swedish Prosecutors are entirely responsible for the sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #164
Such as your own comments in this thread dismissing those who actually want to see sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #143
I don't want to see any evidence because it's none of my business. randome Sep 2012 #147
Well that has been obvious, 'I don't want to see any evidence'. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #166
Brava! Papable hit. Valid point! 1monster Sep 2012 #185
x2 AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #217
+1000 valerief Sep 2012 #56
self-delete; dupe valerief Sep 2012 #62
BS. Why is this case the litmus test for whether a person is a liberal? treestar Sep 2012 #193
No, but right-wingers who pose as liberals on liberal websites brentspeak Sep 2012 #33
+1000 valerief Sep 2012 #57
+1000 more! backscatter712 Sep 2012 #66
Bullseye! Thread win for total succinct accuracy. nt Zorra Sep 2012 #74
K&R KoKo Sep 2012 #39
Only those 'posing' as liberals claim to believe this shit. valerief Sep 2012 #55
From my observations, I've seen quite the opposite reaction among liberals to the charges Cirque du So-What Sep 2012 #59
But I thought Obama wanted Assange 'put away'. randome Sep 2012 #68
Obama is a centrist, not a liberal. We liberals wish he was a liberal. Oh, yeah, and valerief Sep 2012 #134
Yeah, but I don't think a centrist would be out to 'get' Assange. randome Sep 2012 #137
K&R'd. snot Sep 2012 #70
No, he needs to face those charges. alarimer Sep 2012 #71
There are NO fucking charges to face, "serious" or otherwise. 99Forever Sep 2012 #87
Whatever you or Sweden want to call them, the facts are... randome Sep 2012 #89
And again, you leave out one very important fact. Assange has been available for questioning sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #141
Save your imperiosa argumentum... 99Forever Sep 2012 #170
The only reason I repeatedly respond to this posters comments sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #199
It takes energy to do what you are doing to set the facts straight, and I thank you. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #220
What charges? He has never been charged? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #116
In my experience no one is ever too eager to believe rape charges, particularly against a celebrity. D23MIURG23 Sep 2012 #72
I see the opposite in this case. I see a concerted effort to believe the rape sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #173
HUH? I'm a liberal.... Iggy Sep 2012 #73
What were the women wearing? Did they lead him on? Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #75
You should really do some Googling before you post something like that. randome Sep 2012 #78
Far more important than any of that, THEY DENIED THERE WAS ANY RAPE. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #121
Did they say that there was NO SEXUAL ASSAULT OF ANY KIND? Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #149
They stated that there was no threat to them, that they were never in danger sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #161
Well, if that is true, then Assange should be able to win easily in Sweden struggle4progress Sep 2012 #245
"The other woman wanted to report rape. I gave my testimony to support her story" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #277
In what way, exactly, are those who have abandoned the presumption of innocence "liberals"? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #76
You haven't been keeping up with the case since 2010, it seems muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #124
You are claiming to have special expertise on an issue of which you obviously do not such expertise. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #206
'All lawyers'? Totally wrong. You apparently are the one not keeping up with this case. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #238
This is not about success in court; it's about when the allegation is 'rape' muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #239
Some interesting excerpts from Donald Boström's statement: ronnie624 Sep 2012 #287
Note that the rape allegation is about Sofia, not the woman Boström refers to (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #288
Sofia went to the police initially, ronnie624 Sep 2012 #291
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list V struggle4progress Sep 2012 #268
There are a few DUers here who'll do everything they can to smear Assange. Alduin Sep 2012 #77
Really? In a country that brought us... KansDem Sep 2012 #86
Liberals? Why are we getting dumped on again? Rex Sep 2012 #91
Bizarre question. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #94
K&R You got five of them to come out so far. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #112
I neither believe or disbelieve those charges. MineralMan Sep 2012 #119
It is all moot, you're right. randome Sep 2012 #122
And all three of those who were there have said 'there was no rape'. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #142
Did they say that to you, Sabrina 1? MineralMan Sep 2012 #181
No, I have it directly from the evidence. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #230
"the public’s desire to see officials investigate rape/crimes against women is being exploited" HiPointDem Sep 2012 #123
Too bad for Assange that he wasn't accused of torture or banking fraud. OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #130
If he's wanted by Sweden, he's definitely guilty MannyGoldstein Sep 2012 #131
You left Karl Rove out of your tin-foil theory, Manny....nt SidDithers Sep 2012 #136
Yes, he did. But I did not. Karl Rove fled to Sweden when he was wanted here by sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #140
Did you have any specific comments regarding facts? MannyGoldstein Sep 2012 #226
Sweeden needs to back off on Assange. (nt) w4rma Sep 2012 #139
Here's how George Galloway put it... Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #152
"Shooting George Galloway in the face isn't murder! It's just bad gun etiquette!" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #158
Probably. Robb Sep 2012 #145
I think there are people on both sides of this issue liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #146
Wypijewski's piece shows just how much analytical power the Left has lost, by abandoning struggle4progress Sep 2012 #150
Wrong. The analytical powers of the left have never been stronger. Zorra Sep 2012 #165
Your peculiar belief, that everyone who disagrees with you is a rightwinger, can serve struggle4progress Sep 2012 #197
Your peculiar penchant for trashing the left and leftists has Zorra Sep 2012 #202
Your peculiar belief, that everyone who disagrees with you is a rightwinger, can serve struggle4progress Sep 2012 #212
LOL! Bush: "See in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again Zorra Sep 2012 #247
At the risk of being flamed to death... renie408 Sep 2012 #153
Wikileaks is sacred here liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #155
it's nothing to do with wikileaks being 'sacred'. i personally have doubts about what wikileaks HiPointDem Sep 2012 #221
Yeah, it is a mystery, isn't it? randome Sep 2012 #156
Authoritarian government woo me with science Sep 2012 #182
Did you recognize that you use the word "Americans' in the exact same way a renie408 Sep 2012 #214
It IS interesting! OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #218
Some people were so thrilled with Wikileaks treestar Sep 2012 #195
Wow Fla_Democrat Sep 2012 #154
TPTB know how to turn...... DeSwiss Sep 2012 #167
That's because "Israel Shamir" who authored that rumour (at your link) is well known in Sweden msanthrope Sep 2012 #179
Yep. Note the mantra. woo me with science Sep 2012 #184
Many people come here simply to find out what happened Herlong Sep 2012 #177
What we believe does not matter treestar Sep 2012 #188
Is that philosophy true across the boards or just when you find it a good arguing point. Bonobo Sep 2012 #201
Pretty much. A legal system is to make it go by the evidence treestar Sep 2012 #285
What we know is that the prosecutor has evaded and obfuscated and avoided filing sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #204
OMG. enough is enough. Time to trash this thread. Good ridance. liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #205
I believe he should answer the charges, assuming neither guilt nor innocence. AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #208
Well, that's up to the prosecutor. He already voluntary spoke to the police. But the prosecutor sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #211
The Assange defense lied about that in UK court, and the UK court caught them lying: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #270
You "believe he should answer the charges" when no charges have been brought by a prosecutor? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #215
Charges as in formal allegation. 'Kay? Knock off the semantics BS. AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #219
"semantics BS"? Is that different from your "BS"? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #222
You clearly do not value (nor are familiar with) Sweden's legal due process. AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #224
extradition is NOT used merely to ask questions daeron Sep 2012 #227
And you clearly do not understand Sweden's legal due process. A process that so far sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #237
Before accusing others of unfamiliarity with facts.. girl gone mad Sep 2012 #284
What is a 'formal allegation'? Is that a new legal term? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #236
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #271
"... In the Swedish system formal indictment takes place at a very late stage in proceedings, struggle4progress Sep 2012 #272
The Stockholm District Court has ordered Assange's arrest. He appealed twice but lost struggle4progress Sep 2012 #273
There are no charges. If there ever are, then maybe he can answer them. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #235
Besides the charges on his arrest warrant you mean? nt hack89 Sep 2012 #241
Hack's back. How about answering my questions on your standards as the arbiter of a sex crime riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #242
Still denying reality I see? hack89 Sep 2012 #243
Nice try hack. The women didn't report a crime, they went for an HIV test riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #246
So why are they still pursuing the issue? hack89 Sep 2012 #248
If you answer my questions first, I'll answer yours. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #249
None of that is rape if it was consensual. hack89 Sep 2012 #250
I wouldn't. And neither did the women in Sweden. But you are saying you get to decide riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #255
So where did the detailed and graphic description found in the arrest warrant hack89 Sep 2012 #256
I just told you the exact same thing happened to me this morning and I am a-ok with that. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #259
Why are you ignoring the three other charges? hack89 Sep 2012 #261
So why did the women describe an sexual assault? hack89 Sep 2012 #257
NO! The women didn't describe sexual assault! riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #260
I don't think you have shown me any such interview. hack89 Sep 2012 #262
. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #263
So these women have made no public comment since 2010? hack89 Sep 2012 #264
The same woman didn't think it was rape, but did think it was assault tammywammy Sep 2012 #281
"The other woman wanted to report rape. I gave my testimony to support her story" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #278
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #274
The Stockholm District Court has ordered Assange's arrest. He appealed twice but lost struggle4progress Sep 2012 #275
I would ask the opposite question. mzmolly Sep 2012 #254
I can't dismissed the allegations that she was a CIA operative Ichingcarpenter Sep 2012 #258
I thought there was more than one mzmolly Sep 2012 #269
There were two women involved. n/t tammywammy Sep 2012 #283
Yes--you can dismiss those allegations....they are completely fabricated by a nasty little man msanthrope Sep 2012 #292
and they are not victims : they are 'alleged victims' just as the accused has Swagman Sep 2012 #280
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are Liberals Too Eager to...»Reply #69