General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are Liberals Too Eager to Believe Sex Charges Against Julian Assange? [View all]riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)and the government gets to decide or my mother gets to decide if my consensual sex is really rape. The women went to the police NOT to make a complaint about sexual assault but to get Assange to take an HIV test. The government decided to create a case when THERE WAS NO FORMAL STATEMENT.
Say I go to the police about my daughter's drug use, and they notice the handcuffs, chains and whips in my car. They ask me about it and I say it was used for being tied up and whipped during sex. You've now told me the government (or you or my mother) gets to decide if that's rape (or abuse or assault) or not. I can tell you that it was consensual but the government may decide I don't know any better and that I was really assaulted (which I was
).
See how that works?
Nobody should have the right to take away a woman's authority to make those kinds of decisions about her own body (or her life). You appear to be perfectly okay with that.
As a person whose actually been to rape trials, its difficult enough for people to voluntarily discuss every last detail in public about the episode. Your prurient and lurid desire to force women onto the stand to testify AGAINST people they have voluntarily made love to, is disgusting imho.
There's a reason Monica Lewinski burst into tears at the end of her testimony to the Grand Jury in the Clinton affair. She knew she was being used as a political pawn in the Rethug game to get Clinton. Its horrifying and misogynistic.