General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are Liberals Too Eager to Believe Sex Charges Against Julian Assange? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)warrant was valid or not. First, there was no need for it, as Assange was always available for questioning, it was the Prosecutor who has been refusing for two years to accept his offers to speak to her. Assange did speak to the police who, unlike the prosecutor did not refuse to speak to him.
Second, the EAW is not supposed to be issues on someone who has not been charged with a crime.
This prosecutor has violated several rules covering these kinds of situations and may have violated EU law when she issued that arrest warrant when 1) it was not necessary as he was always in contact with her, and 2) it is to be used only to arrest someone against whom charges have been filed.
The more people look at the way this whole mess has been conducted, the more suspicious they are that none of this was ever about any sex crimes from the beginning.
I have to thank you for always providing me with the opportunity to straighten out the misinformation being disseminated about this case. I would forget if it were not for your posts.