Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you bring it down to 1.3 to 1.5, then aggressive contact tracing will bring it down even more Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #1
I don't believe those are related in the way you describe Shermann Apr 2020 #4
Question of resources. You're right that at some point the case load exceeds tracing capabilities.nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #5
Also the virus seemed to go right around contact tracing in Washington State Shermann Apr 2020 #9
It seems to me BGBD Apr 2020 #17
You mean FASTER exponential growth. 1.3 still grows exponentially! nt Shermann Apr 2020 #18
ok. BGBD Apr 2020 #21
+1, ... or until we have a proper amount of sample testing / isolation and tracing done like uponit7771 Apr 2020 #36
Contact tracing with airborne respiratory viral diseases is also extremely hard, it is not at all Celerity Apr 2020 #33
1.5 is horrendous with this level of lockdown Azathoth Apr 2020 #2
Seems that way Shermann Apr 2020 #3
This is not true. R0 is not the only factor. Pobeka Apr 2020 #6
It's very true and you're proving my point Azathoth Apr 2020 #7
We'll just have to disagree. Pobeka Apr 2020 #11
OK, since we're all stuck at home, here is what it looks like Azathoth Apr 2020 #14
R{0} of 1.5 is probably optimistic Shermann Apr 2020 #15
How did you calculate the Beta and Gamma values? Shermann Apr 2020 #24
R naught is beta over gamma Azathoth Apr 2020 #28
THIS !!!! This should be its own OP, its great to have smart people. IF we're R0 1.2 during lockdown uponit7771 Apr 2020 #32
The peak of the SIR model seems to be 4 months out Shermann Apr 2020 #25
+1, I was looking at IHME and it looks at peak deaths not rate of increase just deaths uponit7771 Apr 2020 #34
I haven't looked at the details of the current models, but I'm guessng one of three things Azathoth Apr 2020 #37
Here is a simulation with R{6} Shermann Apr 2020 #38
I think the poster has ***FACTORED IN*** 160 million people, that will take 1 yr is to get to uponit7771 Apr 2020 #31
Herd immunity is not the way...ask the UK Shermann Apr 2020 #8
No one knows about herd immunity levels, until there is adequate testing. Pobeka Apr 2020 #12
Trump won't wait for herd immunity. Trump won't wait for a vaccine. Shermann Apr 2020 #13
The good news is BGBD Apr 2020 #19
Yeah the press asked for clarification on this "decision" that is supposedly his Shermann Apr 2020 #20
Maybe he thinks BGBD Apr 2020 #22
Just posted this in another thread, but well worth the read DeminPennswoods Apr 2020 #10
Or it will gut punch us once Fall hits JCMach1 Apr 2020 #16
Love the pop up expert motif HarlanPepper Apr 2020 #23
Let's toss this little wrinkle into the conversation: Squinch Apr 2020 #26
sounds like shes deliberately talking over trump*s head... samnsara Apr 2020 #27
She is also trying to talk over the reporters heads and filibustering when it comes to testing uponit7771 Apr 2020 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author uponit7771 Apr 2020 #29
K&R, SIP with sick people only gets us more sick people howbeit slower. There were no isolation uponit7771 Apr 2020 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dr. Birx on CV-19 R-Naugh...»Reply #27