Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Polybius

(21,600 posts)

1. I will probably be in the minority on this one, but I hope they side with the Electors

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 12:49 PM

May 2020

The Constitution is pretty clear on this one, they get to vote for anyone they feel like voting for, and should not be punished in any way for not voting for who they were elected to vote for. I'm hoping for a 9-0 or 8-1 decision.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court to weigh state's actions against rogue electors [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 OP

I will probably be in the minority on this one, but I hope they side with the Electors Polybius May 2020 #1

Totally disagree. That makes those electors inevitably open to bribery. OregonBlue May 2020 #2

Maybe they can have an exception, like yelling "fire" in a crowded theater is to the 1st Amendment Polybius May 2020 #3

Good luck with that, given the current state of our government OregonBlue May 2020 #4

If the electors are rubber stamps, then what's the point of the EC? Polybius May 2020 #5

Faithless electors will hurt Dems more than the GOP Wanderlust988 May 2020 #6

There is an easy way to eliminate this problem altogether DFW May 2020 #7