Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)

4. I agree. Didn't they try that a few years ago and it got knocked down?

Reply to n2doc (Reply #2)

Thu Sep 27, 2012, 11:47 AM

Sep 2012

It has pretty much scared people out of trying to invest on their own...at least it has for me. It's just for the big boys. I don't think WS has the control they had 30 years or so ago.

Since they've invested so much money in those computer banks, they aren't going to go quietly into the night. Charging per trade will surely slow them down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

High-frequency trading insanity [View all] n2doc Sep 2012 OP

High speed trades need to be outlawed. RC Sep 2012 #1

Just Tax them n2doc Sep 2012 #2

I agree. Didn't they try that a few years ago and it got knocked down? Frustratedlady Sep 2012 #4

even better rdking647 Sep 2012 #8

It's not insanity. It's human nature to always improve. randome Sep 2012 #3

In a sane world, high frequency trading would be against the law. Like 90% of the financial sector it Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #5

And Goldman Sachs has the fastest computer BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #6

The returns are based upon arbitrage based upon market volatility. PufPuf23 Sep 2012 #7

Or just level the playing field by putting a minimum time limit on trades. Ikonoklast Sep 2012 #9