Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Just read a Reuters article that has me incredibly upset: Supreme Court Shadow Docket [View all]
I did not know about any of this. In the middle of the night, the VERY ACTIVIST, VERY RIGHT WING Supreme Court is making rulings in secret, for all practical purposes.
According to the article, during the 16 years of the GW Bush and Obama administrations, there were only 8 shadow docket requests, 4 of which were granted/approved. During the 4 years of the trump administration, there were 41 cases...28 of which were approved. And they're planning to undo many of Biden's policies.
The 'shadow docket': How the U.S. Supreme Court quietly dispatches key rulings
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In the months before former President Donald Trump left office in January, the U.S. Supreme Court briskly paved the way for the lethal injection of 13 federal inmates, the first federal executions in 17 years.
In many of those cases, the court summarily overturned lower court rulings using an obscure legal procedure known as the shadow docket. But the short-circuit approach, intended only for emergencies, isnt reserved for death penalty cases. It has, in the last four years, significantly changed the way the high court does business.
Increasingly, the court relies on the shadow docket to make decisions in a wide range of consequential cases, often in a dramatically accelerated fashion and without providing signed opinions or detailed explanations. Sometimes, as in death penalty cases, the decisions are irreversible.
snip
The public generally sees the court as sorting out matters of national importance through extensive briefing, oral arguments and lengthy rulings that explain the law. But the number of substantive shadow docket decisions rose dramatically during the Trump administration. In those four years, the government filed shadow docket applications at 20 times the rate of each of the two previous eight-year administrations. The high court granted the governments requests in a majority of cases.
In many of those cases, the court summarily overturned lower court rulings using an obscure legal procedure known as the shadow docket. But the short-circuit approach, intended only for emergencies, isnt reserved for death penalty cases. It has, in the last four years, significantly changed the way the high court does business.
Increasingly, the court relies on the shadow docket to make decisions in a wide range of consequential cases, often in a dramatically accelerated fashion and without providing signed opinions or detailed explanations. Sometimes, as in death penalty cases, the decisions are irreversible.
snip
The public generally sees the court as sorting out matters of national importance through extensive briefing, oral arguments and lengthy rulings that explain the law. But the number of substantive shadow docket decisions rose dramatically during the Trump administration. In those four years, the government filed shadow docket applications at 20 times the rate of each of the two previous eight-year administrations. The high court granted the governments requests in a majority of cases.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-shadow-insight-idCAKBN2BF14U
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
24 replies, 3890 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (39)
ReplyReply to this post
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just read a Reuters article that has me incredibly upset: Supreme Court Shadow Docket [View all]
BComplex
Mar 2021
OP
This scares the snot out of me. It's so far out in left field. Rachel Maddow needs to look
BComplex
Mar 2021
#2
It took me a good hour after I read it to wrap my mind around it. This is nasty stuff.
BComplex
Mar 2021
#10
Time to uncorrupt this Supremely Corrupted Reich Of The U.S. Time for 15 Justices.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2021
#9
Thanks for this info. That's really scary, ancianity. This has been going on even worse than
BComplex
Mar 2021
#19
Which creates a number of reasons why it can't just "not be used" by Biden. This requires
ancianita
Mar 2021
#21
SCOTUS has just handed Democrats' their biggest BFD justification for court reform.
ancianita
Mar 2021
#15