Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BComplex

(8,051 posts)
Wed Mar 24, 2021, 01:01 PM Mar 2021

Just read a Reuters article that has me incredibly upset: Supreme Court Shadow Docket [View all]


I did not know about any of this. In the middle of the night, the VERY ACTIVIST, VERY RIGHT WING Supreme Court is making rulings in secret, for all practical purposes.

According to the article, during the 16 years of the GW Bush and Obama administrations, there were only 8 shadow docket requests, 4 of which were granted/approved. During the 4 years of the trump administration, there were 41 cases...28 of which were approved. And they're planning to undo many of Biden's policies.

The 'shadow docket': How the U.S. Supreme Court quietly dispatches key rulings

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In the months before former President Donald Trump left office in January, the U.S. Supreme Court briskly paved the way for the lethal injection of 13 federal inmates, the first federal executions in 17 years.

In many of those cases, the court summarily overturned lower court rulings using an obscure legal procedure known as the “shadow docket.” But the short-circuit approach, intended only for emergencies, isn’t reserved for death penalty cases. It has, in the last four years, significantly changed the way the high court does business.

Increasingly, the court relies on the shadow docket to make decisions in a wide range of consequential cases, often in a dramatically accelerated fashion and without providing signed opinions or detailed explanations. Sometimes, as in death penalty cases, the decisions are irreversible.

snip

The public generally sees the court as sorting out matters of national importance through extensive briefing, oral arguments and lengthy rulings that explain the law. But the number of substantive shadow docket decisions rose dramatically during the Trump administration. In those four years, the government filed shadow docket applications at 20 times the rate of each of the two previous eight-year administrations. The high court granted the government’s requests in a majority of cases.



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-shadow-insight-idCAKBN2BF14U

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
God! There is so much underhanded crap going on. brush Mar 2021 #1
This scares the snot out of me. It's so far out in left field. Rachel Maddow needs to look BComplex Mar 2021 #2
Wow , thanks for sharing RANDYWILDMAN Mar 2021 #3
True that! It is very dark stuff, and it has far reaching implications. BComplex Mar 2021 #4
Beyond frightening! FM123 Mar 2021 #5
Thanks, FM123! I forgot to post the link! Just added it to OP. BComplex Mar 2021 #6
Congress can fix this... farmbo Mar 2021 #7
This is all new to me and frightening. SharonClark Mar 2021 #8
It took me a good hour after I read it to wrap my mind around it. This is nasty stuff. BComplex Mar 2021 #10
Time to uncorrupt this Supremely Corrupted Reich Of The U.S. Time for 15 Justices. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2021 #9
time to pack the Court. nt barbtries Mar 2021 #11
Looks like it's past time, doesn't it? BComplex Mar 2021 #12
you're right. barbtries Mar 2021 #14
Here's more about it from the American Bar Association Journal. ancianita Mar 2021 #13
Thanks for this info. That's really scary, ancianity. This has been going on even worse than BComplex Mar 2021 #19
Which creates a number of reasons why it can't just "not be used" by Biden. This requires ancianita Mar 2021 #21
SCOTUS has just handed Democrats' their biggest BFD justification for court reform. ancianita Mar 2021 #15
Don't be silly FBaggins Mar 2021 #16
Okay, I won't. But if it's been used for decades, it's a problem of process. ancianita Mar 2021 #18
It's not just Biden that gets to make requests, Frodo. It's atty. generals, governors, etc., BComplex Mar 2021 #20
So? FBaggins Mar 2021 #23
The House Judiciary subcommittee had a hearing on this in Feb. CaptainTruth Mar 2021 #17
Kicking blm Mar 2021 #22
K & R bookmarked FakeNoose Mar 2021 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just read a Reuters artic...