Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
26. That''s a cogent and rational summary with which I fully agree.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:22 PM
Oct 2012

It seems to me that it's absolutism that fails... some simplistic imposition of a 'rule' completely throughout the system, whether that be "free markets are the answer" or "private ownership is bad." It seems to me, for example, that insurance is best established at the common or public level for those risks which are universal, such as threats to health and the need for care both preventative and corrective. For those risks which are associated purely with choices, such as automobile ownership and operation, a regulated free market (since unregulated is NEVER free) offers the most viable approach. The most harmful (to the public) factor in private insurance today seems to me to be sheer scale and the massive economic clout wielded by companies with huge reserves, much of which are leveraged.

The component of our economic system that most cries out for public regulation is labor, imho. While we do have a federal statute that prohibits the treatment of human labor as a commodity, the violations are rampant. Human trafficking, for example, which I regard as including all "work visas" that permit such human trafficking to operate under the guise of legitimacy, is a worldwide scourge. Likewise, the presumed theory that "compensation" for one's labor must only be based on the supply/demand calculation and 'competitive' lowest cost is a huge example of where human labor is treated as a commodity, since the very vocabulary and mechanisms for determining that compensation are solely those associated with commodities. The evil can bee seen most clearly in the use of the term "compensation" itself, since it does not, in any way, factor in such intangibles as the loss to a family of the time spent by a 'provider' or the loss to the laborer of time possibly more beneficially spend obtaining education or rest and recreation.

In summary, I believe we have a long way to go in gaining (or regaining) a more equitable and just balance between the health of a society and the power of wealth. A very long way.

The mere fact that a single individual can amass a fortune greater than the combined wealth of 50% of the entire population of a nation is, to me, prima facie evidence that the 'system' is serious out of balance. Broken. The mere fact that this is not only not seen as prima facie evidence by so many and, in fact, is seen as some kind of 'good' by so many is an indication of how far away we are from achieving any acceptable balance.

Wealth is the invevitable result of hoarding money. nt Xipe Totec Oct 2012 #1
Or simply femrap Oct 2012 #10
I have had this posted on my FB page for a while now. Curmudgeoness Oct 2012 #2
I just posted it to mine. n/t kag Oct 2012 #19
wealth is achieved by claiming a wildly disproportionate share of some group's large cash flow. unblock Oct 2012 #3
Great!... And here's another one.. world wide wally Oct 2012 #4
Hey, Welcome to DU, world wide wally! That IS a good one. calimary Oct 2012 #5
Because they can buy everything they want or need. Thus, they savannah43 Oct 2012 #7
They have so much $$$ femrap Oct 2012 #12
Wealth is the result of getting income FROM THE LABOR OF OTHERS. TahitiNut Oct 2012 #6
Please don't ever apologize for your points of view. If we took all the good points savannah43 Oct 2012 #8
Marx correctly points out the inherint flaws of Capitalism. Ikonoklast Oct 2012 #17
I'm not sure being called a Marxist is an insult. Blanks Oct 2012 #23
That''s a cogent and rational summary with which I fully agree. TahitiNut Oct 2012 #26
Capitalism should equal competition. Blanks Oct 2012 #27
It's not really a shameful thing Risen Demon Oct 2012 #24
K&R SunSeeker Oct 2012 #9
''Hard Work'' is relative YOHABLO Oct 2012 #11
You got it.... femrap Oct 2012 #13
Life Liberty and the Pursuit sheshe2 Oct 2012 #14
Kris Kristofferson wrote that immortal song SemperEadem Oct 2012 #18
Me and Bobby sheshe2 Oct 2012 #29
yes he has SemperEadem Oct 2012 #31
Thank you sheshe2 Oct 2012 #32
Welcome to DU! FailureToCommunicate Oct 2012 #25
Thanks sheshe2 Oct 2012 #28
If every worker were a millionaire they would all be average! StClone Oct 2012 #15
Except R's think it's due to the Exceptional American system thesquanderer Oct 2012 #16
For a Republican, hard means smoozing for tax breaks & subsidies at cocktail hour. nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2012 #20
If money were the only form of wealth, humanity would be as morally bankrupt as the republicans. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #21
That has been one of my recent FB favorites. Thanks truedelphi Oct 2012 #22
Republicans don't believe this. In fact, awhile ago I argued against a Aoxous Oct 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Undermining a favorite Re...»Reply #26