Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(12,286 posts)

12. They would negotiate and agree to a small package

Wed Jun 2, 2021, 07:39 PM

Jun 2021

And then everyone of them would vote against it.

So why not just vote in a big package without them to begin with?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'GOP Isn't Going to Meet Us Halfway' "It's time to go alone--and get this done" [View all] StrictlyRockers Jun 2021 OP

Pukes like to talk and then vote no. pwb Jun 2021 #1

"It's time to go big, bold, and fast on an infrastructure plan" StrictlyRockers Jun 2021 #2

Do you see any scenario in which Bettie Jun 2021 #4

In the House, certainly. maxsolomon Jun 2021 #10

Hear, Hear! Faygo Kid Jun 2021 #5

Time to play hardball. Joinfortmill Jun 2021 #9

They would negotiate and agree to a small package SoonerPride Jun 2021 #12

Large numbers of people WANT bipartisanship, notably many Hortensis Jun 2021 #13