Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joyce Vance on Carroll la...»Reply #16
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Joyce Vance on Carroll lawsuit [View all]

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
16. Even worse!
Reply to StarfishSaver (Reply #15)
Tue Jun 8, 2021, 12:12 PM
Jun 2021

I hope SCROTUS blows this nonsense out of the water.

Seems like a longshot though, with the packed court.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Joyce Vance on Carroll lawsuit [View all] cilla4progress Jun 2021 OP
The decision is a Sur Zobra Jun 2021 #1
Are Trump appointees holding people hostages in the DOJ building? dalton99a Jun 2021 #2
DOJ's argument really isn't about Trump StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #3
And it's a defense of his words while in office... zaj Jun 2021 #4
Hmmm, who is to decide if Putin's Whore "was acting within the scope of [their] office" ... uponit7771 Jun 2021 #5
A judge will decide. StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #9
So we are more concerned about frivolous law suits gab13by13 Jun 2021 #7
No. StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #10
Looks like DOJ is obligated under Westfall Act to defend Putin's Whore only until it's decided uponit7771 Jun 2021 #6
Didn't a federal judge already determine gab13by13 Jun 2021 #8
It was a trial court judge but the case in now on appeal. StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #12
Hmmm, the judge determining whether Feds should be involved makes this more non partisan. FG45 ... uponit7771 Jun 2021 #13
Yes StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #11
DOJ should not be acting as Trump's personal lawyer. lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #14
They're not StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #15
Even worse! lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joyce Vance on Carroll la...»Reply #16
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.