Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Senate Democrats just laid out their $3.5 trillion plan to hike taxes on the wealthy & begin [View all]Hekate
(100,132 posts)24. I loved what Joe said to the millionaires: "Don't worry, you'll still have your 3 houses...
and whatever else you need.
Love that guy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senate Democrats just laid out their $3.5 trillion plan to hike taxes on the wealthy & begin [View all]
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Aug 2021
OP
Hopefully soon people will "wonder" what post we are talking about, if you know what I mean.
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2021
#18
Three members, representing the Congressional Progressive Caucus, have already issued....
George II
Aug 2021
#21
It's also a vague smear of Biden's effectiveness at getting legislation passed AND.....
George II
Aug 2021
#27
This is BIDEN'S bill and you're criticizing him as NOT wanting it? C'mon. And there isn't a....
George II
Aug 2021
#22
Damn the MeidasTouch guys (they're brothers) are good! I love that last view of Biden grinning!!!!
George II
Aug 2021
#36
In 7 months! You know, one of the many Debby Downers posting this morning was griping...
Hekate
Aug 2021
#44
Ya I'm pretty sure while Joe & his Democrats were knee deep & late night writing a 3.5 tr policy....
Budi
Aug 2021
#41
"this legislation is about restoring the middle class in the 21st Century" THIS is Joe Biden 💙
Budi
Aug 2021
#2
The ole, "The devil is in the details". With no new taxes it's going to be hard to get $3.5 trillion
jalan48
Aug 2021
#13
I loved what Joe said to the millionaires: "Don't worry, you'll still have your 3 houses...
Hekate
Aug 2021
#24
Manchin and Sinema will work to take many of the nice things out of the bill,
Roisin Ni Fiachra
Aug 2021
#48
The final bill absolutely can be slashed from what it is now, they only passed the budget
Celerity
Aug 2021
#51
The big hurdle is final passage, the rest is more or less window dressing. Yes, in theory even the
Celerity
Aug 2021
#57
This bill is so progressive there's n way the progressives turn down whatever version is
Johnny2X2X
Aug 2021
#58
I wish people would stop bashing Manchin and Sinema - THEY VOTED FOR IT, and Manchin...
George II
Aug 2021
#50
That's incorrect in regards to the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill, which is the subject of the OP
Celerity
Aug 2021
#56
Manchin voted for a Republican amendment to the bill to keep Hyde, and once again poor people
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#54
All concern about what extreme right wingers at Just the News might think of Democrats
lapucelle
Aug 2021
#63
erm, I used that to show what the RWers think of it, I CLEARLY stated that in my post, and that
Celerity
Aug 2021
#64
Erm, as stated, all concern about what extreme right wingers think of Democrats is duly noted.
lapucelle
Aug 2021
#66
I never claimed that there was RW crowing in either the Yahoo or the Politico articles, you
Celerity
Aug 2021
#67
It also now includes renewing the Hyde amendment, thanks to Joe Manchin.
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#55
I know. They're indicators of what's expendable when the hard work begins on this package. For at
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#61
I know. It is a really handy bargaining chip for both sides -- as marginalized people often are.
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#68
It's a bargaining chip because it lets Republicans score points by ensuring federal funds don't pay
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#72
He did it to signal that down the road, including Hyde in a spending bill he's said he
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#75
A possible signal concerning a hypothetical bill that might be introduced at some time in the future
lapucelle
Aug 2021
#79
It's a non-binding resolution. It is not going to ensure anything about federal funds. N/T
lapucelle
Aug 2021
#77
I mean we can keep saying this back and forth but I think I've made my point clear to anyone
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#78
the entire budget resolution (the basic framework that was just passed) is non-binding
Celerity
Aug 2021
#69
I know. If the entire resolution is nonbinding, it's poing is indicating where people want to go.
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2021
#70