Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bluedevil4

(305 posts)

8. There's

Reply to elleng (Reply #5)

Wed Aug 25, 2021, 06:23 AM

Aug 2021

hope then. If I’m reading it correctly the Biden administration has to write up a plan, correct? It was their lack of a plan that caused the SC to uphold the “remain in Mexico “ Then it goes back to the SC. Also Mexico has to agree with it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court's stunning, radical immigration decision, explained [View all] Nevilledog Aug 2021 OP

Trump's (McConnell's) judges flexing their muscles leftstreet Aug 2021 #1

Teh BARRETT bided her time, dropping "tolerant" crumbs until the Big cases came. UTUSN Aug 2021 #2

Supreme Court Allows Revival of Trump-Era 'Remain in Mexico' Asylum Policy. elleng Aug 2021 #3

There might not be precedent for obscure foreign policy rulings by judges ColinC Aug 2021 #4

The court's brief unsigned order . . . . elleng Aug 2021 #5

There's bluedevil4 Aug 2021 #8

Yes. ** elleng Aug 2021 #11

But in the meantime the policy has to be revived meaning that Mexico can literally ask us for dsc Aug 2021 #9

Judges enforce the law and do not make the law LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2021 #6

Well, why don't we take a cue from this conservative Supreme Court and apply strict Baitball Blogger Aug 2021 #7

Agree. nt in2herbs Aug 2021 #10