Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

elleng

(130,964 posts)

11. Yes. **

Reply to bluedevil4 (Reply #8)

Wed Aug 25, 2021, 11:44 AM

Aug 2021

Last edited Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Too bad these nuances were not mentioned **just now, Wed. @ 8:45 p.m.** on Chris Hayes' show, in discussion between Chris and his legal expert. (Sorry I don't recall her name.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court's stunning, radical immigration decision, explained [View all] Nevilledog Aug 2021 OP

Trump's (McConnell's) judges flexing their muscles leftstreet Aug 2021 #1

Teh BARRETT bided her time, dropping "tolerant" crumbs until the Big cases came. UTUSN Aug 2021 #2

Supreme Court Allows Revival of Trump-Era 'Remain in Mexico' Asylum Policy. elleng Aug 2021 #3

There might not be precedent for obscure foreign policy rulings by judges ColinC Aug 2021 #4

The court's brief unsigned order . . . . elleng Aug 2021 #5

There's bluedevil4 Aug 2021 #8

Yes. ** elleng Aug 2021 #11

But in the meantime the policy has to be revived meaning that Mexico can literally ask us for dsc Aug 2021 #9

Judges enforce the law and do not make the law LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2021 #6

Well, why don't we take a cue from this conservative Supreme Court and apply strict Baitball Blogger Aug 2021 #7

Agree. nt in2herbs Aug 2021 #10