Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amishman

(5,916 posts)
5. Thanks for clarifying, reading up on it you appear to be correct
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 05:38 PM
Oct 2021

The defense might be able to stick Rosenbaum with the rioter label, as based on video he does appear to be participating in the lighting of a dumpster fire before the shooting.

This case is quite a bit more complicated legally than it appears at a glance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only on appeal. elleng Oct 2021 #1
That's my question. The prosecution can't appeal a decision, can they? Poiuyt Oct 2021 #2
The prosecution can't appeal a verdict FBaggins Oct 2021 #20
The prosecutor can't call them victims because it hasn't been established that they are technically AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #3
But the alleged victims can't defend themselves about being rioters because they're dead Poiuyt Oct 2021 #4
Those aren't parallel situations FBaggins Oct 2021 #21
Thanks for clarifying, reading up on it you appear to be correct Amishman Oct 2021 #5
Well there's not going to be a trial for the two dead people to determine that they were 'rioters' Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2021 #6
I'm not necessarily defending it - I'm explaining what I read AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #7
I get your point, fair enough, I always like to know the facts ... Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2021 #9
God there has been so much of this but MuseRider Oct 2021 #8
The video is up on youtube. Everyone should look at it. It will be Tomconroy Oct 2021 #14
As I used to point out to the great irritation of prosecutors: Tomconroy Oct 2021 #13
Okay, so ... let's say I was accused of killing a (possible) prostitute Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2021 #15
The word 'victim' implies that there was a crime. The use of is Tomconroy Oct 2021 #16
Okay fine, don't use 'victim' because of it's implication Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2021 #17
If (and it's a big if) the people pursuing Rittenhouse in the video Tomconroy Oct 2021 #18
Alright Tom I appreciate your taking a stance and arguing for it, I very often do the same Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2021 #19
I don't know what is going to happen but the case is more Tomconroy Oct 2021 #10
Rittenhouse had already shot at people. The men were trying to get his gun away. AJT Oct 2021 #11
Rittenhouse had certainly shot someone. I don't know what the Tomconroy Oct 2021 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the prosecution have...»Reply #5