Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

agingdem

(8,913 posts)

5. yes..

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #1)

Mon May 23, 2022, 11:17 AM

May 2022

Rick Wilson is going all hyperbolic (for a change) but this isn't a sixteen part Netflix rom-com mini series...and considering the public's short attention span, six will probably be enough...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Are you kidding me?' Rick Wilson slams the Jan. 6 Committee for only holding six hearings... [View all] Joinfortmill May 2022 OP

Well, they can always add more, right? hlthe2b May 2022 #1

yes.. agingdem May 2022 #5

I would Rebl2 May 2022 #6

Wilson's not wrong here. Six hearings is not enough to hold these bastards accountable. Efilroft Sul May 2022 #2

The Watergate hearings were broadcast live for two weeks in May 1973. sop May 2022 #3

Don't forget Pantagruel May 2022 #8

Consider Pantagruel May 2022 #4

+1 TheRealNorth May 2022 #7

Copied from other thread... Takket May 2022 #9

Six enough/maybe best, if efficient, impactful, dramatic, highly programmed hearings. tableturner May 2022 #10

I'm hoping that once hearings start, crickets May 2022 #11