Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Enter stage left

(3,396 posts) Mon Jun 13, 2022, 08:04 PM Jun 2022

Would one of you more intelligent than I am... [View all]

please explain to me why a:

1. Supreme Court Justice that can affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people (R v W) be confirmed by a simple majority of 100 people and will serve for the rest of their lives, with no consequences for violating the ethics that could put most people in jeopardy of losing their jobs, or freedom.

2. But to convict a incompetent president who killed about 300,000 people by lying about the effects of a deadly virus, tried to destroy our democracy which has stood for over 200 years, and tried to place "his royal assholeness" as the supreme ruler of this country, has to be convicted by ALL (not 50%) of the jurors that are chosen to convict said "asshole?"

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

And what do we do about it????????

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would one of you more intelligent than I am... [View all] Enter stage left Jun 2022 OP

He has to be convicted by 2/3's of the Senate. nt Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #1

I appreciate your response, but the question is about justice... Enter stage left Jun 2022 #4

The Constitution and the rules of the Senate. Ocelot II Jun 2022 #2

A: The Separation of Powers speak easy Jun 2022 #3

I wouldn't worry about a jury at this point. iemanja Jun 2022 #5

Thanks, but the initial question still stands, why not 50% instead of 100%? Enter stage left Jun 2022 #6

See #2. Ocelot II Jun 2022 #7

That's the rule for all federal criminal cases iemanja Jun 2022 #8

Good point, but we know that unanimous convictions get over-turned on appeal... Enter stage left Jun 2022 #11

Because there is no authority higher than SCOTUS iemanja Jun 2022 #12

I spent many sleepless nights after that fucked up election for that very reason! Enter stage left Jun 2022 #14

Perhaps take that up with Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Schumer? brooklynite Jun 2022 #13

Actually, jury verdicts are rarely overturned on appeal. Ocelot II Jun 2022 #15

The Seventh Amendment Effete Snob Jun 2022 #16

The standard for criminal convictions.. Effete Snob Jun 2022 #9

Because one is a criminal process and one is a political process Sympthsical Jun 2022 #10

Because our founders weren't psychic. That's the same reason for the mass-shooting crisis. NCLefty Jun 2022 #17

Got some tar and feathers? TigressDem Jun 2022 #18