Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(40,570 posts)

10. +1 spot on!

Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:03 AM

Sep 2022

That's why I think this judge should be charged with obstruction.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The 11th circuit has judges appointed by Trump, Garland has to consider that. [View all] fightforfreedom Sep 2022 OP

They may also possibly be educated AND tired of Trump. dchill Sep 2022 #1

Possibly, though the RW extremists he appointed to SCOTUS are educated. Hortensis Sep 2022 #16

It's just hard for me to believe that multiple federal judges... dchill Sep 2022 #19

Garland should arrest the judge for obstructing justice. Emile Sep 2022 #2

No. Good grief they do that in central and South America jimfields33 Sep 2022 #5

Examples? Emile Sep 2022 #9

Toward the bottom of the article jimfields33 Sep 2022 #21

Don't see it. Emile Sep 2022 #23

Good God, no! That's banana republic stuff. Ocelot II Sep 2022 #12

Examples? Emile Sep 2022 #13

So they can be charged with obstruction. Emile Sep 2022 #15

The Federalist Society seems to have done considerable... dchill Sep 2022 #20

They recommend the judges to the president jimfields33 Sep 2022 #22

They don't have the criminal Federalist Society. Kingofalldems Sep 2022 #27

Do I have to say that? Isn't that bothsiderist? dchill Sep 2022 #30

Nope Fiendish Thingy Sep 2022 #3

I hope you are right. fightforfreedom Sep 2022 #4

Yesterday was a holiday, both DOJ and Courts closed. Nt Fiendish Thingy Sep 2022 #7

+1 spot on! Emile Sep 2022 #10

and yesterday it was reported that should a decision go to SCOTUS CatWoman Sep 2022 #8

Dam! I did not know that. fightforfreedom Sep 2022 #11

If the chief justice is dissenting from the majority, the Hortensis Sep 2022 #18

Clarence sits H2O Man Sep 2022 #24

that's what I meant CatWoman Sep 2022 #25

I think that H2O Man Sep 2022 #26

totally agree CatWoman Sep 2022 #28

Right. H2O Man Sep 2022 #29