Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ShazzieB

(22,548 posts)

14. I agree.

Reply to Mr.Bill (Reply #6)

Wed Nov 30, 2022, 11:32 PM

Nov 2022

"...they are sitting on something they don't want us to know about...yet."

I think this is a real possibility. It's one reason I get so tired of people making pronouncements about what evidence the DOJ has or doesn't have to convict TFG of which crimes and what they should do with said evidence. The fact is, we on the outside have access to only a portion of what the DOJ knows. I have a feeling we're all going to get some very big surprises one of these days.

I know some will poohpooh this idea, but I'm past caring very much. Anyone who has already given up hope is beyond my power to influence anyway.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

18 US Code 2384, Did the trump gang do this? [View all] Beachnutt Nov 2022 OP

I'm going to play Devil's Advocate for a minute... brooklynite Nov 2022 #1

This possibly.. Beachnutt Nov 2022 #2

Yeah, but stochastic terrorist hair furhair said "peacefully" in the mic... Justice matters. Nov 2022 #9

Yup. progressoid Nov 2022 #8

Except whatever Jan 6 Committee has to throw in there. TigressDem Nov 2022 #10

Point of clarification? Orrex Nov 2022 #12

These claims go back more than a year, when insurrection was generally seen as the crime. brooklynite Nov 2022 #13

That is interesting Orrex Dec 2022 #18

Nailed it.. Beachnutt Dec 2022 #21

Oathkeepers trial shows that juries know Rhodes & Meggs didn't have to act to conspire sedition. ancianita Dec 2022 #19

Excellent post (nt) Orrex Dec 2022 #22

Bad idea indicting Trump for seditious conspiracy. gab13by13 Nov 2022 #3

Which law that he broke should he be Beachnutt Nov 2022 #4

Obstructing or impeding an official act of Congress, gab13by13 Nov 2022 #11

By my count there are 17. That was a month and a half ago. ancianita Dec 2022 #25

IMO that would depend on the evidence more so than the potential jury. Ford_Prefect Nov 2022 #5

It's pointless to debate this, Mr.Bill Nov 2022 #6

I agree. ShazzieB Nov 2022 #14

Wouldn't it be more direct to start with the Emoluments Clause violations? TheRickles Nov 2022 #7

Just a note: James48 Nov 2022 #16

Thanks, I didn't know that. Seems odd that a violation of the Constitution isn't a punishable crime. TheRickles Dec 2022 #23

Tax violations. James48 Nov 2022 #15

What are the violations? former9thward Dec 2022 #20

obviously they weren't looking for violations. Solomon Dec 2022 #24

Stealing classified documents including nuclear secrets is another serious crime. Liberty Belle Dec 2022 #17