Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lees1975

(7,190 posts)
14. If he isn't indicted and tried, then our laws are meaningless.
Tue Dec 27, 2022, 10:50 PM
Dec 2022

Either the law applies to him, or it doesn't and if he doesn't go to trial, there's no law that applies to him. Open the prisons, turn everyone loose and fire all law enforcement because we won't need them. Everyone can just do their own thing and see how long they can survive.

The DOJ is on borrowed time now, and if they want to get a conviction that means anything, specifically, putting Trump in prison and keeping him from running for office, they must get this done. We're two years out from the event itself, and plenty of other convictions are happening. It's time for him to be indicted, held and convictied. No more excuses.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If anyone thinks that... 2naSalit Dec 2022 #1
I would take my chances on a trial nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #2
hung jury . simple Tetrachloride Dec 2022 #3
That's exactly it... regnaD kciN Dec 2022 #12
The trial would take place in DC where the Grand Juries preside. nt Justice matters. Dec 2022 #28
Same Way I Felt When OJ Was Found "Not Guilty" SoCalDavidS Dec 2022 #4
We know MAGAs will lie during jury selection to get on the jury. Irish_Dem Dec 2022 #5
Jury Selection In Criminal Cases Justice matters. Dec 2022 #27
Yes but are they good at detecting people vulnerable to bribery or blackmail? Irish_Dem Dec 2022 #30
The trial does not have to be 'public' in certain circumstances. Justice matters. Dec 2022 #39
Yes, they can tell who will or won't be vulnerable Genki Hikari Dec 2022 #50
Highly unlikely, imo, if DoJ brings the case against him. elleng Dec 2022 #6
TFG would never plead insanity; he's a narcissist and that would be too humiliating. Ocelot II Dec 2022 #11
Right elleng Dec 2022 #16
They'll wheel him into court in a wheelchair Mr.Bill Dec 2022 #17
No jury will find him not guilty unless the prosecutor hasn't prepared the case properly... brooklynite Dec 2022 #7
I tend to agree. elleng Dec 2022 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2022 #8
He has already lost his mojo. If he is indicted he will delay the trial as long as possible Walleye Dec 2022 #9
Who knows, maybe that's been Mr.Bill Dec 2022 #18
I think it's the only sensible approach, and you know he will put off the trial as long as possible Walleye Dec 2022 #19
NO, retrial republianmushroom Dec 2022 #13
If he isn't indicted and tried, then our laws are meaningless. lees1975 Dec 2022 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2022 #15
Damn right triron Dec 2022 #20
Laurence Tribe predicts indictments in March-April. Justice matters. Dec 2022 #29
If indicted March-April, trial wouldn't be until December at earliest, probably not until 2024 onenote Dec 2022 #37
Garland could ask the DC Court to 'fast-track' procedures invoking primaries imminent. Justice matters. Dec 2022 #40
They can do this on their own timetable. The cases has been made. lees1975 Dec 2022 #47
High Crimes need to be tried BaronChocula Dec 2022 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2022 #22
I would be happy that he was tried, just like I'm happy he was impeached. MMBeilis Dec 2022 #23
Welcome To DU ProfessorGAC Dec 2022 #32
Thank you. I'm sure it's going to be fun. MMBeilis Dec 2022 #52
welcome to DU gopiscrap Jan 2023 #53
We'll cross that bridge when we come to it Takket Dec 2022 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2022 #25
Right? I'm reading this thread thinking I missed the indictment somehow. msfiddlestix Dec 2022 #38
Would the DOJ appeal such verdict if the evidence is super incriminating? nt Justice matters. Dec 2022 #26
No, that'd be Double Jeopardy ITAL Dec 2022 #41
What if there are multiple charges (Counts) and one (or two, or more) of them gets a guilty verdict? Justice matters. Dec 2022 #42
No. Genki Hikari Dec 2022 #45
The insurrectionists whom Trump directed left 5 people DEAD! Emile Dec 2022 #31
Indict them all, they are guilty and everybody knows it. fightforfreedom Dec 2022 #33
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again! old as dirt Dec 2022 #34
I'd be very upset, but I'm not anticipating that. I think the jury verdict in the seditionist case Vinca Dec 2022 #35
If Biden pardoned Trump it would end his presidency, re-election bid. fightforfreedom Dec 2022 #36
Agreed. Justice matters. Dec 2022 #43
Depends on the case the idiot is tried for Genki Hikari Dec 2022 #44
Jury nullification is a real possibility in that scenario... SKKY Dec 2022 #46
This is exactly why there shouldn't be a BIG trial ... jgo Dec 2022 #48
I feel strongly that Trump should face multiple prosecutions in different venues. Just A Box Of Rain Dec 2022 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author Prairie_Seagull Dec 2022 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An indictment and a jury ...»Reply #14