Iraq war leukemia rates worse than after Hiroshima bombing

[Mosby]

12. This research data says the opposite.

Cancer Trends in Iraq 2000–2016


The prevalence of some cancer risk factors (obesity, smoking, unhealthy diet, diabetes) has recently changed in Iraq with no sufficient preventive measures been implemented. Iraq has high incidence rates in breast, lung, and bladder cancers, besides a growing burden of many others.5

....

Leukemia showed a non-significant increasing trend, started with a rate of 3.24/100 000 in 2000 and ended with a rate of 4.37 in 2016 with a peak of 5.9 in 2004, both genders were equally affected. Hodgkin disease also showed a non-significant increase (from 1.40 to 1.44/100 000), affecting both sexes equally, while non-Hodgkin lymphoma showed a significant increase in its rate from 2007 forward, affecting both genders equally [Figure 5]. Skin cancer showed a gradual decrease to 2008, followed by a gradual increase for both sexes.

....

The trend of total cancers in Iraq revealed a clear up slope especially after 2008, and particularly in the middle region, which might be attributed to the fact that this region was the main target during the 2003 war and exposed to a huge amount of bombing. However, cancer rates in Iraq seem to be lower than the regional and global rates.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847549/

Chalabi has a degree in international security, no idea why anyone thinks she is competent when discussing research methodologies and statistics.

Note that my data comes from the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM), not some British paper obsessed with the US.