Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JudyM

(29,491 posts)
15. Intent is much harder to prove than a reasonable person standard.
Sat Apr 22, 2023, 01:54 PM
Apr 2023

Disgusting lack of insight and even simple humanity on that court. This is their public behavior; just imagine their convos behind the scenes.

So disappointing. What assholes. Joinfortmill Apr 2023 #1
No kidding!!! What ASSHOLES!!! calimary Apr 2023 #10
Roberts is a like a Vegas slot machine peppertree Apr 2023 #20
Hating on women is so much fun for these ignorant fucks. Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #2
If the shoe were on the other foot, they wouldn't be laughing, they'd pass a new law MagickMuffin Apr 2023 #3
Yep. Innocent protests and the SC gets top of the line expensive security, paid for by taxpayers. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #5
To be laughed at BigMin28 Apr 2023 #23
Regular Americans, especially women, are second class citizens. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #35
RBG was right GopherGal Apr 2023 #28
+1 Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #36
The only thing RBG was wrong about... SunSeeker Apr 2023 #73
Make lemonade and keep throwing it at them bucolic_frolic Apr 2023 #4
the same court that cried like babies and demanded a new law when peaceful protesters mopinko Apr 2023 #6
That is both discouraging and shocking RussBLib Apr 2023 #7
"disturbing" is an understatement imo orleans Apr 2023 #68
+1000. Just when I thought my opinion of republicans ecstatic Apr 2023 #72
not trashing a 'norm' stopdiggin Apr 2023 #76
Hypersensitivity? gratuitous Apr 2023 #8
I believe strongly in the 1A Mad_Machine76 Apr 2023 #9
Threatening is already illegal and we have clear legal definitions. Zeitghost Apr 2023 #57
Stalking *is* threatening IMHO Mad_Machine76 Apr 2023 #58
Of course it is Zeitghost Apr 2023 #60
was she able to get an order of protection? nt orleans Apr 2023 #69
No Zeitghost Apr 2023 #78
"dealt with the issue" is exactly what needs to be done MarcA Apr 2023 #74
Hateful jokester fuck ... dchill Apr 2023 #11
Stalking is just an extension of domestic violence by an ex-boyfriend or husband. Lonestarblue Apr 2023 #12
I BeerBarrelPolka Apr 2023 #50
How else are you gonna protect not fooled Apr 2023 #13
roberts doesn't need to look elsewhere Marthe48 Apr 2023 #14
Thank you. milestogo Apr 2023 #18
Intent is much harder to prove than a reasonable person standard. JudyM Apr 2023 #15
What horrible people. ShazzieB Apr 2023 #34
If you think women are second class citizens this is one more case that proves the point. They are! flashman13 Apr 2023 #16
This sounds like an opportunity to make the country worse. Turbineguy Apr 2023 #17
So verbally terrorizing someone is okay with them? WestMichRad Apr 2023 #19
This is horrifying. There's such a tiny slice of humanity this SCOTUS finds has any intrinsic value Hekate Apr 2023 #21
They only see Mankind, not all of Humanity. intheflow Apr 2023 #52
Contempt for women underlies his ability to joke about terrorism of women. Timeflyer Apr 2023 #22
Repukes can kill people out of fear of their own god damn shadow but onecaliberal Apr 2023 #24
Just wow. How dreadful to be a hopeful stalking victim and have to hear this. nt Hortensis Apr 2023 #25
Stalking is funny, laughable? Just cyber-stalking or all forms? Is following someone txwhitedove Apr 2023 #26
As a criminal defense attorney, I find Roberts's behavior disturbing. They have a problem with Pepsidog Apr 2023 #27
This is one of those ACLU amicus briefs so focused on minutia it ends up doing harm NullTuples Apr 2023 #33
Thanks for the link. Pepsidog Apr 2023 #49
agree, agree, agree orleans Apr 2023 #70
Recommended. H2O Man Apr 2023 #29
Roberts may have done so to hide the emergent property of there being 1000's of them NullTuples Apr 2023 #30
Screw ACLU and EFF. Two organizations I am embarrassed to have supported. quaint Apr 2023 #31
with you on ACLU KT2000 Apr 2023 #53
Yes, I think this is a big mistake on their part. Susan Calvin Apr 2023 #65
So, it will be OK to stalk supreme court justices - ya know as harumph Apr 2023 #32
As well as their children or wives Rebl2 Apr 2023 #55
Roberts following the Tucker Carlson routine of cherry-picking data and then laughing at it. Midnight Writer Apr 2023 #37
I'm sure Roberts would be cool if some violent psycho were stalking hi Orrex Apr 2023 #38
Normalizing child abuse EndlessWire Apr 2023 #39
I find it interesting that these guys could so casually lump their mothers together with vanlassie Apr 2023 #54
Asking a SCOTUS member with an Opus Dei approval to be reasonable on women's issues DFW Apr 2023 #40
He doesn't get it at all. Men get stalked, too, and it ruins their lives Warpy Apr 2023 #41
Agreed BeerBarrelPolka Apr 2023 #51
Sounds like recess at elementary school. So many assholes with way too much power. nt Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #42
Where are the amicus briefs from organizations like Sanctuary for Families. ancianita Apr 2023 #43
This from the court that sought and got taxpayer funded protection for their personal property Freethinker65 Apr 2023 #44
From the crew who flips out at the mere thought Ruby the Liberal Apr 2023 #45
What an Unprofessional Insensitive Cha Apr 2023 #46
Makes Justice Alito's whining... Trueblue Texan Apr 2023 #47
Kicking for visibility. love_katz Apr 2023 #48
If he or his family was on the receiving end, I'd get he'd not be so cavalier about Bristlecone Apr 2023 #56
Let's be clear mountain grammy Apr 2023 #59
Odd how you can shoot someone in a 'stand your ground' state just because you are fearful. 70sEraVet Apr 2023 #61
glib race bannon Apr 2023 #62
... sheshe2 Apr 2023 #63
THOUSANDS of messages. That's a fucking crazy person. Wingus Dingus Apr 2023 #64
Kicking with disgust MustLoveBeagles Apr 2023 #66
If it's inevitable, relax and enjoy it. In R Logic. czarjak Apr 2023 #67
BOOKMARKIKNG this thread orleans Apr 2023 #71
K&R spanone Apr 2023 #75
There is no Supreme Court anymore Farmer-Rick Apr 2023 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice John Robert...»Reply #15