Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About the 2nd Amendment t...»Reply #7
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: About the 2nd Amendment to the Constituion.... [View all]

Ocelot II

(130,678 posts)
7. There's a lot of analysis of the Second Amendment to be found online.
Reply to Stuart G (Reply #5)
Mon May 1, 2023, 12:38 AM
May 2023

If you want to go right to the source, read the Federalist Papers, for example: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed29.asp

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
About the 2nd Amendment to the Constituion.... [View all] Stuart G Apr 2023 OP
It may also have been written in response to the British attempt to confiscate weapons at Lexington 3Hotdogs Apr 2023 #1
Not sure what your point is but your history is wrong. former9thward May 2023 #2
Sorry history is wrong....? Stuart G May 2023 #3
Not history, your "history". former9thward May 2023 #16
Wouldn't $270 of 2023 dollars have been a fortune back then? brush May 2023 #6
It said *the equivalent* of $270 of 2023 dollars. Ocelot II May 2023 #9
So much for clarity in writing. Why not just say "would've cost about $8.00 then"? brush May 2023 #10
Because knowing what something cost back then has no context without knowing what it equates to now MichMan May 2023 #12
I am sure my 5th grade writing teacher is turning in her grave. former9thward May 2023 #15
It was 3 pounds. former9thward May 2023 #14
Oh, were pounds mentioned? brush May 2023 #17
At the link. former9thward May 2023 #20
Exactly. Xolodno May 2023 #11
Sorry, no. The "well-regulated militia" was never intended as a police force. Ocelot II May 2023 #4
People make mistakes.......Ok...??? ....or ...??? Stuart G May 2023 #5
There's a lot of analysis of the Second Amendment to be found online. Ocelot II May 2023 #7
Thank You for the link....Appreciate your mentioning the "Federalist Papers." Stuart G May 2023 #8
Today's gun apologists are wrong; the future has unfolded, and accepting the current carnage is evil sanatanadharma May 2023 #13
a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an GuppyGal May 2023 #18
Strict constructionalism or Living document. There is only one answer IMO Prairie_Seagull May 2023 #19
Aren't Sheriffs and their deputies the equivalent of Police? Model35mech May 2023 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About the 2nd Amendment t...»Reply #7
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.