Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

intrepidity

(8,590 posts)
5. If by "lawfare narrative" they mean the Lawfare podcast/website
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 01:56 PM
Jun 2023

Then I am maximally impressed that any Trumpians even know what that is, much less know about any content therein.

That said, it may be a valid point, since the document at issue indeed has not been found (yet) in Donald's possession. Terribly unfortunate that Bedminster was never searched, one more casualty of DOJ/FBI foot-dragging.

No doubt witnesses will be testifying about what documents were being discussed during that session. At one point Trump says, "Here, give me that" which indicates that the doc was in the hands of someone besides himself and I've no doubt that there is already grand jury testimony by that person describing what they were holding. When the prosecution has that person on the stand, they will then show them the copy DOJ has and ask them to verify it was the same doc and how they know. And so on.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why the fuck buy into the narrative that Jack Smith is corrupt? Effete Snob Jun 2023 #1
+1 H2O Man Jun 2023 #13
Are you under the impression that I bought into it? Goodheart Jun 2023 #16
Jack Smith absolutely did not "leak" it. ancianita Jun 2023 #17
I never claimed he did. Goodheart Jun 2023 #19
Ah, I see. Okay, then. Thanks. ancianita Jun 2023 #20
The case, itself, includes quotes from that tape. And it's highly doubtful that Smith, knowing how allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #34
Might be caused by the Trump and Magats claiming the documents were planted at Mar a Lago. ShazamIam Jun 2023 #2
What they don't get ... VMA131Marine Jun 2023 #3
They didn't leak it. maxsolomon Jun 2023 #4
You can't get evidence in a case by a FOI former9thward Jun 2023 #18
The CNN report doesn't say the tape was leaked, either. ancianita Jun 2023 #23
The poster said it was a FOI request. former9thward Jun 2023 #27
Hey, the dumbshit has MULTIPLE people using their cell phones to record his damning statement. Why.. machoneman Jun 2023 #28
You got proof of that? If so, link it. ancianita Jun 2023 #33
If by "lawfare narrative" they mean the Lawfare podcast/website intrepidity Jun 2023 #5
Jack Smith didn't leak the tape. No way. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #6
Did a little research--now I get it. Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #7
How interesting that you were able to present wnylib Jun 2023 #8
lol. yup. Recycle_Guru Jun 2023 #38
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt onenote Jun 2023 #9
There is zero evidence H2O Man Jun 2023 #10
They know it's damning. It's an act of desperation to claim Jack Smith leaked it. Goodheart Jun 2023 #21
It sounds like somebody thinks they understand the best evidence rule. rsdsharp Jun 2023 #11
Step 1: call the author to the stand as a prosecution witness. brooklynite Jun 2023 #12
Exactly what's going to happen. ancianita Jun 2023 #24
By that logic, defenders need only burn or lose evidence lindysalsagal Jun 2023 #14
Perhaps the leak came from the person who made the recording? Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #15
If I had to bet I'd wager it came from trump's team Goodheart Jun 2023 #22
No, because it was taped by, and owned by, the team writing the Meadows book. ancianita Jun 2023 #25
You mean "The Rat" leaked it? Goodheart Jun 2023 #26
You see rats where there are none. ancianita Jun 2023 #30
Jack Smith never leaks anything ... end of discussion FakeNoose Jun 2023 #29
+1 You're right, as usual. ancianita Jun 2023 #31
I'm not even sure this can be called a "leak" MissMillie Jun 2023 #32
This recording was done at Bedminster NJ not Florida. Prairie_Seagull Jun 2023 #35
I don't see why not. Goodheart Jun 2023 #36
Further info Goodheart. Prairie_Seagull Jun 2023 #40
thank you foe sharing what "your friend" thinks about this Recycle_Guru Jun 2023 #37
Not my friend. Goodheart Jun 2023 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, the question you shou...»Reply #5