General Discussion

ancianita

(43,162 posts)

20. Ah, I see. Okay, then. Thanks.

Reply to Goodheart (Reply #19)

Tue Jun 27, 2023, 01:56 PM

Jun 2023

Now you can pass these facts along to the comedian.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, the question you should be asking yourself: why did Jack Smith leak the tape? [View all] Goodheart Jun 2023 OP

Why the fuck buy into the narrative that Jack Smith is corrupt? Effete Snob Jun 2023 #1

+1 H2O Man Jun 2023 #13

Are you under the impression that I bought into it? Goodheart Jun 2023 #16

Jack Smith absolutely did not "leak" it. ancianita Jun 2023 #17

I never claimed he did. Goodheart Jun 2023 #19

Ah, I see. Okay, then. Thanks. ancianita Jun 2023 #20

The case, itself, includes quotes from that tape. And it's highly doubtful that Smith, knowing how allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #34

Might be caused by the Trump and Magats claiming the documents were planted at Mar a Lago. ShazamIam Jun 2023 #2

What they don't get ... VMA131Marine Jun 2023 #3

They didn't leak it. maxsolomon Jun 2023 #4

You can't get evidence in a case by a FOI former9thward Jun 2023 #18

The CNN report doesn't say the tape was leaked, either. ancianita Jun 2023 #23

The poster said it was a FOI request. former9thward Jun 2023 #27

Hey, the dumbshit has MULTIPLE people using their cell phones to record his damning statement. Why.. machoneman Jun 2023 #28

You got proof of that? If so, link it. ancianita Jun 2023 #33

If by "lawfare narrative" they mean the Lawfare podcast/website intrepidity Jun 2023 #5

Jack Smith didn't leak the tape. No way. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #6

Did a little research--now I get it. Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #7

How interesting that you were able to present wnylib Jun 2023 #8

lol. yup. Recycle_Guru Jun 2023 #38

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt onenote Jun 2023 #9

There is zero evidence H2O Man Jun 2023 #10

They know it's damning. It's an act of desperation to claim Jack Smith leaked it. Goodheart Jun 2023 #21

It sounds like somebody thinks they understand the best evidence rule. rsdsharp Jun 2023 #11

Step 1: call the author to the stand as a prosecution witness. brooklynite Jun 2023 #12

Exactly what's going to happen. ancianita Jun 2023 #24

By that logic, defenders need only burn or lose evidence lindysalsagal Jun 2023 #14

Perhaps the leak came from the person who made the recording? Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #15

If I had to bet I'd wager it came from trump's team Goodheart Jun 2023 #22

No, because it was taped by, and owned by, the team writing the Meadows book. ancianita Jun 2023 #25

You mean "The Rat" leaked it? Goodheart Jun 2023 #26

You see rats where there are none. ancianita Jun 2023 #30

Jack Smith never leaks anything ... end of discussion FakeNoose Jun 2023 #29

+1 You're right, as usual. ancianita Jun 2023 #31

I'm not even sure this can be called a "leak" MissMillie Jun 2023 #32

This recording was done at Bedminster NJ not Florida. Prairie_Seagull Jun 2023 #35

I don't see why not. Goodheart Jun 2023 #36

Further info Goodheart. Prairie_Seagull Jun 2023 #40

thank you foe sharing what "your friend" thinks about this Recycle_Guru Jun 2023 #37

Not my friend. Goodheart Jun 2023 #39