Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
They may well do that because if they rule against Trump the insurrectionist bucolic_frolic Jan 2024 #1
So which States drop Biden? WarGamer Jan 2024 #2
The ones with evidence dpibel Jan 2024 #7
But there was no test of that evidence. WarGamer Jan 2024 #10
I'm sorry, you really don't get it dpibel Jan 2024 #12
Hmmm... WarGamer Jan 2024 #13
"Just be honest"? dpibel Jan 2024 #22
Let's just agree to disagree. I'm on day 5 of COVID and dont want to argue. WarGamer Jan 2024 #23
I hope you are well soon... DemocraticPatriot Jan 2024 #35
Some ex-Confederates were disqualified from serving in Congress after the civil war DemocraticPatriot Jan 2024 #34
And yet, this SCOTUS could overturn the CO ruling because of the absence of a conviction Fiendish Thingy Jan 2024 #26
Misdemeanor trespass dpibel Jan 2024 #28
You omitted some important information Fiendish Thingy Jan 2024 #29
"...trying to guess which imaginative hook they will hang their hats on..." LudwigPastorius Jan 2024 #41
I'm with you pfitz59 Jan 2024 #46
The disqualification process Zeitghost Jan 2024 #45
If my aunt had wheels, she'd be a bicycle kcr Jan 2024 #50
Surely you can understand Zeitghost Jan 2024 #65
The 14th also disqualifies someone found to have "given aid and comforts to the enemies , thereof" MichMan Jan 2024 #32
About those enemies dpibel Jan 2024 #36
It's a moot point because President Biden will beat any Republican on the ballot by 20 points MichMan Jan 2024 #39
Boots here in Floriduh is checking into MOMFUDSKI Jan 2024 #21
So which foreign country can put up their own candidate? kcr Jan 2024 #49
Sure, they can put them up. yagotme Jan 2024 #62
Exactly pinkstarburst Jan 2024 #52
Just "no" to all that NoRethugFriends Jan 2024 #55
Biden did not participate in an insurrection treestar Jan 2024 #57
So you say FBaggins Jan 2024 #59
Exactly Polybius Jan 2024 #60
A big thing that a lot here seem to miss also. we were actually at war, then. nt yagotme Jan 2024 #61
One small disagreement there FBaggins Jan 2024 #64
I agree - the older I get the more I dislike the US concept if "United" States. walkingman Jan 2024 #3
Entirely agree dpibel Jan 2024 #8
Do you oppose states being allowed to legalize marijuana in violation of federal laws? MichMan Jan 2024 #33
No, I think it should be legalized in every state. Actually I would prefer decriminalized walkingman Jan 2024 #43
But since it isn't legalized on the Federal level, is it ridiculous for states to do so ? MichMan Jan 2024 #44
Absolutely not. ☮ Just another example that each state is like another country. walkingman Jan 2024 #58
Governor Gerry of Mass., 1812 yagotme Jan 2024 #63
I live in Washington State pfitz59 Jan 2024 #47
I think they'll say that enforcement of Section 3 needs to be legislated by the US Congress maxsolomon Jan 2024 #4
Too bad about that due process and equal protection dpibel Jan 2024 #11
Section 4 hasn't been legislated, either. See: the annual debt-ceiling farce. maxsolomon Jan 2024 #14
That is the only thing I have seen so far that seems reality-based and plausible. Maru Kitteh Jan 2024 #18
"So which States drop Biden?" J_William_Ryan Jan 2024 #5
Yeah. The confederate states will totally agree with that and forget the whole thing. Maru Kitteh Jan 2024 #20
Which is why SCOTUS won't rule this as a states rights issue Fiendish Thingy Jan 2024 #27
It doesn't even require changing the ballot Shrek Jan 2024 #53
LOL...they will absolutely shoot down Colorado 6-3 Prairie Gates Jan 2024 #6
From listening to Trump's lawyer, I would say that the fix is in Walleye Jan 2024 #9
Of COURSE it is. And if anyone is expecting anything nobler from Trump's MAGA SCOTUS... B.See Jan 2024 #16
The fix is that they have a supermajority on the Supreme Court and can do whatever they want Prairie Gates Jan 2024 #19
8-1 Polybius Jan 2024 #38
That could be a very interesting dissent. nt FBaggins Jan 2024 #48
I'm starting to think they will use the political question doctrine to say courts cannot determine whether Trump tritsofme Jan 2024 #15
Fun fact dpibel Jan 2024 #24
SCOTUS might vote against trump on this one because Crows, Kochs, etc., Silent Type Jan 2024 #17
Ruling that he's disqualified only in CO would create chaos. Fiendish Thingy Jan 2024 #25
I don't expect them to do that AkFemDem Jan 2024 #30
SCOTUS is being asked to give definite meaning to 14A bucolic_frolic Jan 2024 #51
Section 3 is poorly written Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #31
Like they do with the 2nd? dpibel Jan 2024 #37
The second amendment is a mess as well Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #40
Too much ambiguity moondust Jan 2024 #42
Didn't they just agree to hear the case? Patton French Jan 2024 #54
Its not the voting that is at issue here.... it qualification to serve getagrip_already Jan 2024 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I suspect the Supreme Cou...»Reply #57