Weird! Anonymous is *horrible*, but harming the 99% is nothing to worry our little minds about?

[MannyGoldstein]

Last edited Tue Nov 20, 2012, 06:26 PM - Edit history (1)

It's interesting how some posters are making a concerted effort to wipe out any notion that Anonymous stopped Rove and Company from flipping votes.

(Although, as Thom Hartmann has pointed out, there are some very interesting things that happened...)

Anyway, these folks who are super-strident against Anonymous possibly being helpful seem to be the same people who totally deny awful, awful bipartisan efforts such as attempts to slash Social Security and Medicare, laws that get rid of the pesky judiciary with no recourse, job-obliterating free trade agreements, and other horrific stuff that we can actually do something about.

Human nature is interesting, no?

To be clear, it's very reasonable to ask for evidence before believing this - or anything. My point is that it's fascinating that this is such a HUGE DEAL for some people, while really important stuff for which there's tons of evidence is denied. Evidence is important some times, not others, I guess.