Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The term MAGAT has been banned [View all]Progressive dog
(7,312 posts)69. I have no problem with calling them magats,
and I don't get why the word should be banned. It's not like they were born that way or can't help themselves. Letting them claim that they are for making America great again is delusional. What they advocate and work for seems to me to be the opposite of making America great.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not about reaching them. It's about ** us ** not using Hitler terminology
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2024
#121
No, it really iS NOT. Appeasing a bully or Fascists through history... Give me ONE example where that
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#161
Wow - it's as if you didn't bother reading the post you replied to
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2024
#190
Stop the attacks on me and others! We have EVERY right to express our opinions.
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#194
Do you really need that much support that you need to blame someone else too?
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2024
#197
I think Roosevelt and Churchill were probably the ones saying nasty things about fascists, not Hitler.
D23MIURG23
Feb 2024
#153
They want to kill me with their policies & women like me--take away my freedom to even travel
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#160
All of what you say is true, and I abhor and reject every aspect of their actions and goals.
bluesbassman
Feb 2024
#163
To fail to address them as they attack us in even the least derogatory way, as with a homophone term
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#167
I don't like repug, or repuke, etc. - I wouldn't mind a site banning any of them.
thesquanderer
Feb 2024
#174
You need to read my post again. I said NOTHING about hurting their feelings
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2024
#220
To me all the childish names come off as "Free Republic" and too much like the damn MAGAts
LiberalArkie
Feb 2024
#70
Treat the assholes with the utmost kindness so they won't be such assholes anymore
dalton99a
Feb 2024
#4
Can't say I disagree, I usually shake my head at grown adults using school yard insults and wanting to be taken serious.
tritsofme
Feb 2024
#5
How many MAGAts were included in your survey? How many non-evangelicals?
Hermit-The-Prog
Feb 2024
#88
While I'm tickled you are such a prolific reader of my posts, I don't really see your point.
tritsofme
Feb 2024
#182
these types of insults are like psyops. It makes the term MAGA toxic to the uninitiated.
wyldwolf
Feb 2024
#75
You know that it is emblematic. If a silly acronym is TOO MUCH for some then I don't think
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#27
Such a glorious and legendary Album....Such beauty can't exist in their universe.
cayugafalls
Feb 2024
#227
Oh, it's daily now, and they hang around forever while more deserving diaries get pushed off.
ArkansasDemocrat1
Feb 2024
#242
Actually, I find their editorial staff to be rather weak minded. If they aspire to "but her emails" MSMism...
NNadir
Feb 2024
#158
yes, yes that is perfectly okay because they are simply deplorable and are expected to do such things
orleans
Feb 2024
#201
Go back and examine the language the Nazi's used against Jews, long before the camps
Fiendish Thingy
Feb 2024
#58
Agreed! The MAGAT mindset is completely incompatible with a democratic nation
PTL_Mancuso
Feb 2024
#150
What did they refer to the Japanese as? Or the Iraqi's and Afghani's in those wars?
Fiendish Thingy
Feb 2024
#89
This is possibly one of the worst analogies I have ever seen, at best trivializing, at worst obscene. n/t.
NNadir
Feb 2024
#171
Bullshit. Julius Streicher was hung at Nuremberg for "crimes against humanity."
NNadir
Feb 2024
#179
THEY created MAGA, self-named and they are TRUMPISTS. This whole thing is ridiculous.
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#116
'MAGAT' MOCKS CHOICES THE INDIVIDUAL IN QUESTION HAS REPEATEDLY MADE!
ArkansasDemocrat1
Feb 2024
#207
Well republicans become a little sensitive about names they call themselves.
republianmushroom
Feb 2024
#95
I have no problem going back to DEPLORABLES LOL This adult wants to insult !!!!!
GuppyGal
Feb 2024
#104
Have they banned the phrase "Democrat Party" because that sure as hell is derogatory also.
Ferrets are Cool
Feb 2024
#107
Probably because they don't want to sink low to the same level of the name calling Republicans do to Democrats.
ZonkerHarris
Feb 2024
#110
That has been their policy for at least the last six months, or longer.....
DemocraticPatriot
Feb 2024
#111
I'm guessing it's Kos. He may be a Democrat working to elect Democrats, but he's not the brightest bulb on the planet.
NNadir
Feb 2024
#118
I stopped using magat when tRump used the Hitler "vermin" phraseology
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2024
#120
Not true, Bernardo. They and RW media have referred to themselves as MAGA Trumpists for years now.
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#144
I've never seen "MAGA Trumpists" on reich-wing sites. Tons of "MAGA". . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2024
#146
Even Fox has referred to them that way (MAGA Trumpists as opposed to non-Trump conservatives/R's)
hlthe2b
Feb 2024
#147
Because some Dems think it's courteous to take cookies to a street fight.
NoMoreRepugs
Feb 2024
#151
These people are clear that they want to outright murder us yet some worry that calling them MAGAt is too offensive.
hadEnuf
Feb 2024
#183
Yeah, history has shown us that trying to reason with viscous brainwashed Nazis
hadEnuf
Feb 2024
#214