General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Weird! Anonymous is *horrible*, but harming the 99% is nothing to worry our little minds about? [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)My obsession with predictions is pretty simple. They force one making a claim to either defend it with details, or to dance around, which is what you are doing.
You should be able to describe a path through which Obama could make good on his evil plan. After all, that's what he'd be doing if your claims about him were correct. He's scheming right now as I type, right?
You should be able to name the Dem Senators who would go along with him. And the Dem House members. You should be able to describe what he'd get for making this compromise. I mean, does he get a defense cut for a cut in SS? If SS is truly a chip, surely you have some idea what he could get for it. What he PLANS to get for it.
And your Hitler reference fails not just because its a lame Hitler reference, but because you use your own secret decoder ring items to describe what you think are "loud and clear" ... things that they "say the same things for years and work elaborate plans". If he has an elaborate plan, you should be able to DESCRIBE it. How will it unfold!
Consider this ... if Obama lost re-election, what would you be saying ... that Obama had this secret plan, but he was unable to carry it out. You get to claim your predictions were ACCURATE even though nothing ever happened.
Again, you've created a WIN WIN situation for your position. If something happens, you were right. And if nothing happens, you are also right.
Which returns us to why I again ask you to make a PREDICTION. Go on the record. Explain how the "elaborate plan" will unfold.
Don't just howl at the moon.