Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Let's see how the shitBird NYT responds to the revelations being out in the open. NoMoreRepugs Apr 25 #1
This guy sounds like a real jerk. tavernier Apr 25 #2
Agreed. And I doubt that their source is what he says he is. ificandream Apr 25 #14
It comes from the inherited wealth it seems. LiberalArkie Apr 25 #33
And those of us pointing out the obvious bias Voltaire2 Apr 25 #3
I'm curious to see if any of the perennial NYT apologists will comment. yardwork Apr 25 #6
I'm wondering what horrible insult Clinton Voltaire2 Apr 25 #8
did bill take a shot at them during the impeachment? mopinko Apr 25 #13
I don't think the Clinton coverage was bias. It was inexperience. ificandream Apr 25 #21
The negative NYT coverage of the Clintons started NanaCat Apr 25 #42
The Times didn't start the negative coverage. The right-wing media did. ificandream Apr 25 #47
She was a female candidate for President PatSeg Apr 25 #22
marrying Bill Clinton whom they loathed with the power of a billion suns dsc Apr 25 #28
Bill Clinton was, is, an incredibly brilliant man from a poor background. shrike3 Apr 25 #40
Including 5 random NYT articles edhopper Apr 25 #9
Claude Rains would be shocked, as well. dchill Apr 25 #61
LOL! ShazzieB Apr 26 #66
Hmmmmmm malaise Apr 25 #4
he either slept through et tu Apr 25 #11
This does not surprise me. Lonestarblue Apr 25 #5
Also a key player in all of the hate on Democrats NanaCat Apr 25 #43
All the more reason... 2naSalit Apr 25 #7
Done some months back. I should have done so with, "...but her emails" NNadir Apr 25 #15
we cancelled last fall. I don't miss it. NT LittleGirl Apr 25 #25
How petty and selfish. SergeStorms Apr 25 #10
Actually A.G. believes he's above it all, like so many of his idols. Imagine that? Ford_Prefect Apr 25 #12
Even when the Nazis Farmer-Rick Apr 25 #34
Fritz Thyssen found this out when he was interred at Dachau DBoon Apr 25 #54
Wow, I looked him up Farmer-Rick Apr 26 #65
Anyone still have a subscription....if so why??!! PortTack Apr 25 #16
Because it's one of the two best newspapers (along with the WashPost) in the country. ificandream Apr 25 #24
No, it is not a good newspaper NanaCat Apr 25 #44
"Vast majority"? Sounds like you monitor it closely. maxsolomon Apr 25 #46
You might still be thinking of... Think. Again. Apr 25 #53
Nana Cat is right. soldierant Apr 25 #64
I still subscribe to the Times & Wash Post - TBF Apr 25 #27
Love to see Biden do a short interview with A.G. KS Toronado Apr 25 #17
So, "give us an interview ro we give you bad coverage?" Happy Hoosier Apr 25 #18
Thug Journalism. The Unmitigated Gall Apr 25 #30
Nothing in this story surprises me. shrike3 Apr 25 #41
"retribution". Sounds just like trump. So glad I cancelled my subscription to The NY Times, after they accused JohnSJ Apr 25 #19
Their new motto: "All the ethics we don't use when we print" Wonder Why Apr 25 #20
Sulzberger allegedly told employees to court conservative readers, so this should come as no surprise. JohnSJ Apr 25 #23
When and why have so many big shots in this country become so petty? SleeplessinSoCal Apr 25 #26
I doubt it's new - it's just that everything is so much more in the public eye now with social media, etc. TBF Apr 25 #31
This "either you do a sit-down interview with us, OR we'll harp on your age, and whatever else" is coercive. summer_in_TX Apr 25 #29
A smart candidate does not do interviews NanaCat Apr 25 #45
With the chairman's petulant attitude, it's not surprising President Biden hasn't elected to give an interview dlk Apr 25 #32
All the news orangecrush Apr 25 #35
Right. And how many interviews has Trump given? jalan48 Apr 25 #36
I like the NYT's word games and puzzles. Prof. Toru Tanaka Apr 25 #37
Peter Baker gave the game away during an interview post-Hur report. shrike3 Apr 25 #38
I thought newspapers were in the business of reporting the news, not retribution. surfered Apr 25 #39
They are all too often in the business of flattering the owner's ego - "power without responsibility" muriel_volestrangler Apr 25 #48
Lapdogs Peter Baker and Jonathan Swan have rushed to Sulzberger's defense FelineOverlord Apr 25 #49
This is just petty and stupid enough to be real. n/t malthaussen Apr 25 #50
It's a shame.. Think. Again. Apr 25 #51
Talk About Petty and Vindictive! The Roux Comes First Apr 25 #52
The New York Times is on the same election rigging level as the National Enquirer OnDoutside Apr 25 #55
I remember reading are article being interviewed by USA Today kimbutgar Apr 25 #56
The Petty Feud Between the NYT and the White House LetMyPeopleVote Apr 25 #57
Okay so that's it then. Iggo Apr 25 #58
Do they still emphasize the term 'Sleepy Joe'? keithbvadu2 Apr 25 #59
Republican OWNED media does this all the time. No surprise. live love laugh Apr 25 #60
The Judith Miller Times Strikes Again! D23MIURG23 Apr 25 #62
The NYT needs an enema. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 25 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT reporter says their n...»Reply #33