Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
40. The thing about international success is that it is invisible and quickly forgotten.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:30 AM
Nov 2012

Four years ago we were ginning up a major confrontation with Russia. That is gone. We have had multiple transfers from dictatorships to struggling democracies with remarkable little loss of life.

Then there is Burma. I have a house that is less than 2 kilometers from the Burmese border. For the last 15 years I have given up all hope that a major civil war could be avoided there. The Army was so entrenched. And a new generation of leadership came and the President took an enormous risk by making a personal trip there and embracing a very shaky transition.

Now we see for the first time in decades the possibility of a peaceful transition for the people of Burma. Burma is very much like Yugoslavia in that it has no real center and is made up of dozens of ethnic groups that really don't like each other.

But it goes deeper than that. I believe that the President (and SOS Clinton's) major second agenda in Burma was to show the new but isolated leadership in North Korea that if they take a step towards us, even a small one, the President will take a big step towards them. Burma was, behind China, North Korea's number one trading, diplomatic, and military friend. By bringing Burma out of isolation the President is showing North Korea that entirely new relations are possible.

I don't think that the message of the President getting Aung Suu Kyi out of house arrest and into parliment was lost on Cuba either.

Similarly I don't think that the message was lost on Iran either.

People don't see the very nuanced, and high risk, efforts of the President's international movements because the President, and SOS Clinton would rather deflect attention and get results than land on aircraft carrier and have a photo op.

I believe that the President's actions have saved tens of thousands of lives, and his foriegn policy has advanced the interests of peace in areas where there wasn't a lot of hope, more than any other President in recent times. Clinton's intervention in Yugoslavia saved the lives of thousands of Muslims. The President's interention in Burma has done the same, but he did it without landing a military force.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

same as Hillary Enrique Nov 2012 #1
It's been written about Rice that she reflects Obama's views more closely than any other advisor leveymg Nov 2012 #3
No, she actually reflects John McCain's views more closely than any other advisor., kelliekat44 Nov 2012 #36
The dog and pony show being performed by McCain and Co. proves that they think Obama's cornered blm Nov 2012 #4
isn't it odd that everyone is accepting Kerry would be the only other choice? Enrique Nov 2012 #6
Not a Bonesman. She went to Stanford and Oxford. leveymg Nov 2012 #7
She was a Rhodes scholar FarCenter Nov 2012 #11
The Empire got darker, but the sun never really set. leveymg Nov 2012 #16
Isn't it odd that GOP senators are now praising Kerry who they don't agree with when it comes to blm Nov 2012 #8
My feeling was that the Repugs want Rice (she's hawkish) and were hoping to push Obama KoKo Nov 2012 #13
I think you're right. They're trying to make it so that he can't help BUT nominate Rice. nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #23
Kerry was VERY different karynnj Nov 2012 #33
Libya was bad news, and Syria is worse. allrevvedup Nov 2012 #2
Yes, it was obscene, the destruction of one of Africa's most independent and sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #24
Thanks for this substantive review, elleng Nov 2012 #5
I'm not the biggest fan of Rice. I just thought she was unfairly being criticized by the GOP. vilify Nov 2012 #9
Rice is very hawkish, Huntsman would be better. Or maybe Kerry nt Report1212 Nov 2012 #10
Soooo, does McCain & Co. actually want her to be SoS for that very reason? moondust Nov 2012 #12
well..that's what I'm thinking..and of course I could be wrong but it "smells." n/t KoKo Nov 2012 #15
Good call...you never know who/what the con artists are coning. Auntie Bush Nov 2012 #14
I know its impossible but I'd love it if Obama would select someone from outside the 1% as SOS riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #17
Sigh...we are the dreamers...I agree with you...but will never happen..still KoKo Nov 2012 #19
An article that supports your basic points. grantcart Nov 2012 #18
Susan Rice would not be my choice for SOS......Interesting Article...but then that's KoKo Nov 2012 #20
Thank you. There are enough real reasons to be wary of Rice. We don't need the GOP bullshit ones. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2012 #21
She appears to be in lockstep with SOS Clinton fried eggs Nov 2012 #22
Pick someone else. jsr Nov 2012 #25
"Homeland" is such a Fascist word; I HATE THIS BUSHISM. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #26
Same as every SOS proceeding and including hillary still_one Nov 2012 #27
How about we get someone to end that tradition. morningfog Nov 2012 #29
That would be nice but it won't happen. The SOS represents the president still_one Nov 2012 #31
she just joined the ranks of my "hell no" list.... mike_c Nov 2012 #28
John Kerry was never a war monger - ever karynnj Nov 2012 #34
Which is why he voted for Bush's wars. Le Taz Hot Nov 2012 #35
And ProSense Nov 2012 #37
Exactly, but ProSense Nov 2012 #39
Does that ProSense Nov 2012 #38
Recommended. H2O Man Nov 2012 #30
We should encourage him to take those necessary risks to try to stop the next war. leveymg Nov 2012 #32
The thing about international success is that it is invisible and quickly forgotten. grantcart Nov 2012 #40
Agreed - I'd like to see Kerry stay in Senate and lead Foreign Policy there, but, know he'd make one blm Nov 2012 #42
You first line said it all. Puzzledtraveller Nov 2012 #50
Oh, great. Quantess Nov 2012 #41
All through this Benghazi flap I've had this feeling that we are being manipulated ... Ganja Ninja Nov 2012 #43
No Daylight Between Condi and Susan otohara Nov 2012 #44
"It’s clear that Iraq poses a major threat." Martin Eden Nov 2012 #45
Take the Susan or Condi quiz at FP. Bet you can't tell who said what. leveymg Nov 2012 #46
The Iraq War is a good litmus test issue cpwm17 Nov 2012 #54
Obama came out against the war in 2002 Martin Eden Nov 2012 #59
to pick her based entirely on the fact that the republicans don't like her liberal_at_heart Nov 2012 #47
Thanks for starting this thread my friend. k&r n/t bobthedrummer Nov 2012 #48
Well, thank you again, my friend! leveymg Nov 2012 #49
She will do whatever the president tells her to do if that is the case still_one Nov 2012 #51
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #52
“I think he has proved that Iraq has these weapons and is hiding them... Solly Mack Nov 2012 #53
Kucinich is looking for work now Capt. Obvious Nov 2012 #55
Would you support Chuck Hagel over Susan Rice? joshcryer Nov 2012 #56
False Dichotomy Logical Fallacy: Poll_Blind Nov 2012 #57
I'm just seeing if that is the extent of their criticism. joshcryer Nov 2012 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Susan Rice Vocally Suppor...»Reply #40