Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Obama Loses: The Courts [View all]BzaDem
(11,142 posts)18. That is patently absurd.
To the extent I could afford one, I would bet a nice steak dinner that Kagan would vote with the other liberals in upholding gay marriage.
Either way the election goes, as far as the Court goes, we're screwed.
It is really hard to come up with a statement more factually inaccurate than that. Kagan and Sotomayor are going to vote with the other liberals in the vast majority of consequential cases.
They said the court wasn't a sufficient reason to vote for Gore over Nader. What was the direct result of that? Citizens United (reversing Sandra Day O'Connor's decisive vote to uphold the Constitutionality of campaign finance).
If we continue to allow inaccurate statements like yours to go unchallenged, there won't be anything left in this country that will be protected by the courts. A fifth conservative will be the fifth vote to rule progressive economic policy unconstitutional. (See pre-1937.) All the dreams of progressives in this country will be destroyed for decades, because even if they end up winning in 20 years and passing the most progressive bills possible (say, starting with single payer), much of it will be thrown out by the justices Republicans appoint in 2013.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A really good reason to ensure a second term for Pres. Obama and holding the Senate. nt
Cognitive_Resonance
Jan 2012
#4
If he wins, based on his actions can you promise that he will not shift the Court more to the right?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#5
He is going to get the nomination. He's going to win. It's a sure thing.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#36
People who rely upon logic are not "demonizing Obama." In a democracy, the people have a right
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#9
"Fauxgressives" = Namecalling. I'm now selecting the ignore button. Bye.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#14
The problem is the lack of logic in your question -- not that it "relies on logic."
BzaDem
Jan 2012
#17
Thank you for your suggestion, but the Supreme Court is full. He does not have any current nominees
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#23
The funny thing is that I would not be surprised if Sotomayor ended up being known to history as the
BzaDem
Jan 2012
#26
Sotomayor and Kagan may turn out to be more liberal than any liberal justice in decades.
BzaDem
Jan 2012
#19
Too true. And how strange that some are not only not enraged, they are cheerleaders.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#37