Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: And suddenly the 'assassination attempt' [View all]
soldierant
(8,003 posts)44. I think we may have already found that out.
https://politizoom.com/was-trump-shot-or-scratched-by-teleprompter-glass-major-difference/
There's a closeup of him showing a scratch on his cheek that a bullet couldn't possibly have made - but a small piece of shattered glass certainly could - such as from a teleprompter.
There's a closeup of him showing a scratch on his cheek that a bullet couldn't possibly have made - but a small piece of shattered glass certainly could - such as from a teleprompter.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They KNOW we aren't capable of their evil actions. That's why the gaslighting works so well.
NoSheep
Jul 2024
#88
Who gives a fuck if it was bullet or plastic. It was an assassination attempt and he's lucky to be alive
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#16
CTs constantly seek confirmation. Anti-narrative facts trouble them, but are swept under the rug. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#65
That's a blood splatter, not a scratch. And what an annoying site that was. I backed out as fast as I could. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#50
I agree the ad volume is most annoying. It's a pity, because the writers are all sharp - not perfect, but sharp.
soldierant
Jul 2024
#54
President Trump does not need Sen Vance to win Ohio. Ohio has gone the opposite direction of
kelly1mm
Jul 2024
#30
It is a common honorific to refer to all former Presidents as 'President X'. Like how President Obama and President
kelly1mm
Jul 2024
#58
The thing is he doesn't deserve the "honorific", as he has no honor and is a traitor. YMMV. nt
PunkinPi
Jul 2024
#68
Save him? Trump won Ohio in 2020 & he's currently well ahead in polling there.
oldsoftie
Jul 2024
#85
Yeah the Senate is definitely in danger. Something else too many seem to ignore.
oldsoftie
Jul 2024
#95
Since the courts are now full of evangelicals along with a lot of the DOJ and SS just waiting on prophecy
LiberalArkie
Jul 2024
#11
According to their books, that is exactly what they will do. Evangelicals (Pat Roberson & others)
LiberalArkie
Jul 2024
#35
I am of the camp that the CTs have the burden of proof and all they offer is conjecture, hence their face-plant. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#63
Anyone who thinks that President Biden will win in a landslide is fooling themselves.
totodeinhere
Jul 2024
#21
Once it came out he was an incel Republican withe the profile of a school shooter, there was only so much mileage
Quixote1818
Jul 2024
#31
A best-seller (if well written) could be titled "Fat Cat Elegy". Vance is an oligarch
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#64
Interesting factoid. Aligns with libertarianism and faux-libertarianism. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#73
Goes to show he values money more than freedom. Love of money (greed) is shared by Rs and faux-libertarians. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2024
#79