Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gab13by13

(23,789 posts)

13. I am not a Garland fan, people here are aware of that, but

Reply to Bobstandard (Original post)

Fri Aug 9, 2024, 10:46 PM

Aug 9

this delay most likely has nothing to do with Garland and even if it did we aren't having a trial pre-election, it is way too late because Garland dragged his feet before he hired Jack Smith.

We will have a new Attorney General under President Harris and TSF will be prosecuted, next year.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Say it ain't so Merrick! [View all] Bobstandard Aug 9 OP

Post removed Post removed Aug 9 #1

"Obama allowing Turtle to steal a seat" TwilightZone Aug 9 #3

Just did not seem Traildogbob Aug 9 #5

Or it could be because the SCOTUS order was ambiguous and lacked clarity. TwilightZone Aug 9 #2

If he deserves it? Bobstandard Aug 9 #6

Always the go to, there are a dozen possible reasons but you know, many don't need proof to accuse. Bev54 Aug 9 #23

Slamming Garland for Smith asking for another delay? former9thward Aug 9 #4

It's Obama's fault. TwilightZone Aug 9 #7

Not slamming. Worrying Bobstandard Aug 9 #8

FWIW criticism is premature... anciano Aug 9 #9

Criticism of Garland is not premature Bobstandard Aug 9 #11

What factual data can you share anciano Aug 9 #12

As I said above... Bobstandard Aug 9 #14

That is just it, possibilities, and it could be one that has nothing to do with Garland. Bev54 Aug 9 #24

As I observed up front, I agree. nt Bobstandard Aug 9 #29

this is pure bullshit bigtree Aug 9 #20

Preach it bigtree! Fiendish Thingy Aug 9 #22

And bigtree makes its appearance Bobstandard Aug 9 #25

You got a point-by-point rebuttal? Wednesdays Aug 10 #33

Yes. Bigtree is gaslighting Bobstandard Aug 10 #35

the idiocy here is that JACK SMITH is in charge of this prosecution of Trump. He represents the govt. in these appeals. bigtree Aug 10 #41

Oh boy. Bobstandard Aug 10 #45

lol bigtree Aug 10 #47

My faith in Garland's leadership was destroyed two years ago, a momentary pause when Smith was hired msfiddlestix Aug 9 #10

I am not a Garland fan, people here are aware of that, but gab13by13 Aug 9 #13

One possibility is an evidentiary hearing pre election Bobstandard Aug 9 #16

Are you sure Jack Smith is not deliberately delaying the pretrial proceedings for nefarious reasons? Beastly Boy Aug 9 #15

I hope you're right. Seriously. nt Bobstandard Aug 9 #17

I am sure I am right. Beastly Boy Aug 9 #18

I don't buy the idea that we're too dumb.. Bobstandard Aug 9 #28

I didn't say I am too dumb. In fact I am not, if I may say so. What I said was that I am too ignorant Beastly Boy Aug 10 #34

Good point. Bobstandard Aug 10 #36

I made other, more relevant points that demonstrate the brilliance of our system. Beastly Boy Aug 10 #38

Again, good point. Bobstandard Aug 10 #39

See link at my post #19. Nt Fiendish Thingy Aug 9 #21

Oh damn, I am devastated! Beastly Boy Aug 9 #27

It ain't so. Fiendish Thingy Aug 9 #19

Worth the time! TommyT139 Aug 10 #31

We're going on four years since the crimes were committed, and three since the evidence was gathered AND presented. lees1975 Aug 9 #26

It's not incompetence, it's by design. onecaliberal Aug 10 #30

It's always good H2O Man Aug 10 #32

I totally agree. Bluethroughu Aug 10 #37

It's too much. I can't stand it. Garland not aggresively pursuing the case three years ago is why... brush Aug 10 #40

He is over, bring it! Brainfodder Aug 10 #42

Consider DemonGoddess Aug 10 #43

I want to be right... Bobstandard Aug 10 #46

I want YOU to be right, I meant to say Bobstandard Aug 10 #49

"..will risk appearing..." TO WHO?!?!? uponit7771 Aug 10 #44

42 months and counting (includes foot dragging) republianmushroom Aug 10 #48

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Say it ain't so Merrick!»Reply #13