General Discussion

Mr.WeRP

(1,098 posts)

80. And I'm still waiting for an answer: why are you defending Musk and Trump?

Reply to onenote (Reply #77)

Fri Oct 25, 2024, 11:31 PM

Oct 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dear Garland: Why is the Media doing your Job? Can we have an indictment now? [View all] Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 OP

the federal government relies on grand juries to bring indictments bigtree Oct 2024 #1

" according to current and former United States, European, and Russian officials" Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #2

the process of gathering that evidence will take more than a few weeks. bigtree Oct 2024 #4

Buh bye Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #5

lol bigtree Oct 2024 #7

Post removed Post removed Oct 2024 #8

Well said. nt Bobstandard Oct 2024 #10

Garland reminds me of Caesar Flickerman from The Hunger Games Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #11

Thank you MotownPgh Oct 2024 #33

If Trump wins, it is on Garland's head. He allowed several cases against Trump expire under Statute of Limitations Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #34

So I guess what you're saying is that it is on Biden's head. The buck stops here and all that? onenote Oct 2024 #49

Biden regrets appointing Garland. So he knows. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #51

So he stepped aside rather than remove Garland? Don't think so.. onenote Oct 2024 #53

Garland is awful and you know it. Deflecting to Biden is just dumb. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #55

Pretty sure I'm not the one deflecting. But glad to see you acknowledge that you're also blaming Biden. onenote Oct 2024 #57

You're the one who said it, not me. You blamed him. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #58

Oh, so now its not on Biden's head that he let Garland mismanage DOJ? onenote Oct 2024 #61

You keep flip flopping on what you want me to say Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #64

Not the one flip flopping here. onenote Oct 2024 #70

Now you're just projecting. Seems to be in style these days Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #71

One moment you are saying it's Biden's fault Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #72

Quoting your words:"Yes, the buck stops with the President. And yes, Biden should have replaced Garland, I agree." onenote Oct 2024 #73

Quoting your words: " Can someone identify the law that Musk is said to have broken" Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #74

And I'm still waiting for an answer: Medias claimed Musk coordinating with the Trump campaign was illegal. onenote Oct 2024 #77

This is one to watch. Bev54 Oct 2024 #79

And I'm still waiting for an answer: why are you defending Musk and Trump? Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #80

I answered your bullshit accusation by calling it exactly that: bullshit. onenote Oct 2024 #81

And I answered your BS. You are clearly in favor of rich assholes Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #82

You must have studied under the republicans given your posts. onenote Oct 2024 #83

To a certain extent but you are wrong about moniss Oct 2024 #13

sure, if they have enough evidence to proceed bigtree Oct 2024 #14

There is a great difference between moniss Oct 2024 #19

not what I wrote bigtree Oct 2024 #25

I think it's obvious that moniss Oct 2024 #32

you failed to address what I wanted to convey in my post you responded to bigtree Oct 2024 #45

It shouldn't take four years to prosecute a traitor Emile Oct 2024 #3

He is Bidens biggest mistake.... yourout Oct 2024 #6

I think Biden said something like that recently. Think. Again. Oct 2024 #9

He did Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #12

It isn't Garland holding up the trials of Trump it is the courts. Bev54 Oct 2024 #28

Let's review the timeline, shall we? Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #36

If you think Garland waited for Smith, you are really really out of touch. Bev54 Oct 2024 #38

And yet in all that time, not one indictment Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #43

He was brought in to do the indictments, after Garland's office had worked through a number of Bev54 Oct 2024 #44

Links to cases? Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #46

I have linked many articles on this here on DU and am not going to spend my time going back Bev54 Oct 2024 #47

Then your claim is bogus because I know there are none Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #48

My "claim" is bogus because you failed to do your own research? Bev54 Oct 2024 #68

Your claim is bogus because you are asking to prove a negative Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #75

Post removed Post removed Oct 2024 #76

+1 onenote Oct 2024 #78

If Kamala wins the presidency, and the Repubs take the Senate, she might not be able to have a different AG Intractable Oct 2024 #15

Then do what Republicans do gab13by13 Oct 2024 #17

I think she can appoint anyone. newdayneeded Oct 2024 #31

She can. And as she has said she would have Rs in her cabinet Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #42

The point isn't about the procedure to indict someone gab13by13 Oct 2024 #16

Well said, sir. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #18

I would not be surprised if TSF wins if he doesn't leave Garland stay on. Scary thought, Emile Oct 2024 #22

He's got Aileen Cannon lined up for that job. He needs a total sycophant like Hitler's generals. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #66

Oh boy, another possible letter. republianmushroom Oct 2024 #20

Yeah, but this time he'll be double-dog daring him. Xavier Breath Oct 2024 #21

Believe we are getting to that stage. republianmushroom Oct 2024 #23

Whoa there! The double-dog stage is pretty extreme. Not to be taken lightly.../s Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #29

Current "Policy" means Garland must schedule.... harpua74 Oct 2024 #24

At the very least, Musk should lose his government contracts. OLDMDDEM Oct 2024 #26

Common Garland! Clouds Passing Oct 2024 #27

What is Merrick Garland's political affiliation? Emile Oct 2024 #30

If he is blatantly not doing his job, does it matter? Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #35

Musk for Prison 2024! -misanthroptimist Oct 2024 #37

Reality Winner wasn't a billionaire, she was made an example of. joshcryer Oct 2024 #39

Title: "Why did it take the DOJ more than two years to indict Donald Trump in the 2020 election case?" Hotler Oct 2024 #40

Another comparison... 2022 German coup d'tat plot Lars39 Oct 2024 #41

Can someone identify the law that Musk is said to have broken by being a Trump cheerleader? onenote Oct 2024 #50

Sticking your head in the sand so you can't see there is a crime is not an excuse for Garland. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #52

Not answering the question suggest that you don't have an answer. onenote Oct 2024 #54

Probable Cause is enough to get an indictment. Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #56

Talking to Putin might be a Logan Act violation but how is it probably cause for charging election interference? onenote Oct 2024 #59

If there is probably cause that he could have leaked intel or was asked to turn Starlink off for China Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #60

Accusing me of defending Trump and Musk is bullshit. onenote Oct 2024 #62

You seem very interested in making the argument that Musk has committed no crime Mr.WeRP Oct 2024 #63

No, I'm asking what crime he has committed. onenote Oct 2024 #69

Garland again. Such a poor AG. Always foot dragging and delaying in trump's favor. brush Oct 2024 #65

The question I keep wondering is why must a grand jury be the determining body to determine evidence? msfiddlestix Oct 2024 #67