Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's a damn shame! Dem4life1234 Nov 30 #1
The founders never imagined this situation. COL Mustard Dec 1 #7
I admit I'm a bit ignorant of the law Dem4life1234 Dec 1 #9
Unfortunately Article II of the Constitution establishes who can be President. COL Mustard Dec 1 #11
Absolutely! Dem4life1234 Dec 1 #15
The reality melm00se Dec 1 #35
Turns out, Nixon actually had it right !!!!!!!!!!! DENVERPOPS Dec 1 #22
The Democratic party has always let them get away with it... RhapsodyFav Dec 1 #37
This! Dem4life1234 Dec 1 #39
Trump will only go to Russia when summoned. 33taw Nov 30 #2
Trump is considered "criminally inadmissible" to Canada, but he could apply for a "parole" of that status. C0RI0LANUS Nov 30 #3
i googled and this was the a.i. response: orleans Dec 1 #40
Thank you for the clarification, orleans. The TRP sounds like the "parole" term I used. C0RI0LANUS Dec 1 #42
Oh Canada! SNAP! IzzaNuDay Nov 30 #4
It is true. I Googled it and posted a couple of times. Canada isn't the only country, either Deuxcents Nov 30 #5
Yeah, but they let Bush and Cheney in. LisaM Nov 30 #6
Is a DUI a felony though? Polybius Dec 1 #24
I mostly remember that they wouldn't let you in Canada if you had one. LisaM Dec 1 #27
As much as I can't stand drinking and driving, a forever ban seems a bit extreme Polybius Dec 1 #29
The orange one brought the ring to Biden to kiss. That's called professional courtesy. Hotler Dec 1 #8
... ancianita Dec 1 #10
Thank you Unwind Your Mind Dec 1 #12
Absolutely. The facts should be known and shared. ancianita Dec 1 #13
I'll add my thanks to the above. The vilification of Garland has always struck me as loonacy. EarnestPutz Dec 1 #14
Empty Wheel? msfiddlestix Dec 1 #16
What about it? You got fact based info from them? If so, please post it. ancianita Dec 1 #17
Not I. Just checking my gut impression. I had got a "hit" you might be connected. msfiddlestix Dec 1 #20
I see. Well, I do have Empty Wheel bookmarked, for sure. ancianita Dec 1 #21
Well that leaves DOJ and AG off the hook, then. So all we have to do is blame our outdated Constitution msfiddlestix Dec 1 #19
The Garland DOJ did its job, so why should it even be on the hook? There's WAY more evidence that it shouldn't be at all ancianita Dec 1 #23
"Nov 18 2022 Garland appoints Jack Smith" Polybius Dec 1 #25
Thanks for that timeline BDavinciNY Dec 1 #34
+1, Garland ***COULD HAVE*** assigned an SC first day in office knowing J6 could've been a big deal that involved MAGA uponit7771 Dec 1 #43
Makes total sense. Emile Dec 1 #18
It's funny, but it's just trump being himself and enjoying making people squirm and sit at his feet. C Moon Dec 1 #26
No joke! elleng Dec 1 #28
I just figured that those Trumpists' wives were thirsty for him, and demanded a meet. LudwigPastorius Dec 1 #30
Well, probably since the five eyes monitor international phone calls, Trudeau did not want anyone else to know what he LiberalArkie Dec 1 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 1 #32
"You're" wondering. Spelled correctly in the tweet. Maru Kitteh Dec 1 #33
Ha! Beautiful! Joinfortmill Dec 1 #36
Bullshit. Under Canadian law, if the government opts to allow him to enter the country, he can enter the country onenote Dec 1 #38
stop it! you're spoiling the magic of the moment orleans Dec 1 #41
I think it was intended as humor. nt Xipe Totec Dec 1 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If your wondering why Tru...