Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 16 Dem Senators Voted To Give Musk Team Access To Treasury Payment System [View all]Wiz Imp
(9,813 posts)127. The Labor Secretary nominee actually appears to be a good candidate.
Some Republicans will definitely oppose her. Democrats should not. We will never get a better nominee for this position.
https://www.govexec.com/management/2024/11/trump-picks-lori-chavez-deremer-pro-union-republican-lead-labor-department/401279/
Trump picks Lori Chavez-DeRemer, a pro-union Republican, to lead the Labor Department
Chavez-DeRemer, who recently represented Oregon in Congress, has often been one of the lone Republican supporters of various pro-union bills and has advocated for improvements to the child care system.
In Congress, she was one of three House Republicans to support the PRO Act, one of the most substantial union bills in recent years that would strengthen workers rights to organize and limit retaliation from employers. She was also one of the few House Republicans to support the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act, which would expand collective bargaining rights for state and local government workers positions predominately held by women.
Chavez-DeRemer has advocated for improvements to the child care system. Last year, she was one of only five Republicans who responded to The 19ths questions about the kind of child care policy theyd support, saying she was in favor of expanding a tax credit for employers who offer child care.
Chavez-DeRemer has advocated for improvements to the child care system. Last year, she was one of only five Republicans who responded to The 19ths questions about the kind of child care policy theyd support, saying she was in favor of expanding a tax credit for employers who offer child care.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trumps-labor-secretary-nominee-lori-chavez-deremer/story?id=116156534
The National Education Association (NEA), the nation's largest professional employee organization, applauded the nomination.
"During her time in Congress, Lori Chavez-DeRemer voted against gutting the Department of Education, against school vouchers, and against cuts to education funding. She cosponsored the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act, the PRO Act, and other pro-student, pro-public school, pro-worker legislation," NEA President Becky Pringle said in a statement.
The PRO Act would expand labor protections regarding workers' rights to form unions in the workplace. Chavez-DeRemer, who signed on to co-sponsor the bill this summer, is one of just three Republicans in the House to do so.
"This record stands in stark contrast to Donald Trump's anti-worker, anti-union record, and his extreme Project 2025 agenda that would gut workplace protections, make it harder for workers to unionize, and diminish the voice of working people," Pringle added.
"During her time in Congress, Lori Chavez-DeRemer voted against gutting the Department of Education, against school vouchers, and against cuts to education funding. She cosponsored the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act, the PRO Act, and other pro-student, pro-public school, pro-worker legislation," NEA President Becky Pringle said in a statement.
The PRO Act would expand labor protections regarding workers' rights to form unions in the workplace. Chavez-DeRemer, who signed on to co-sponsor the bill this summer, is one of just three Republicans in the House to do so.
"This record stands in stark contrast to Donald Trump's anti-worker, anti-union record, and his extreme Project 2025 agenda that would gut workplace protections, make it harder for workers to unionize, and diminish the voice of working people," Pringle added.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
16 Dem Senators Voted To Give Musk Team Access To Treasury Payment System [View all]
Rendville
Feb 2025
OP
Be careful what you wish for. You may end up with a Senate with 75 or 80 Republicans.
Wiz Imp
Feb 2025
#114
He needed to prevent members of his caucus that he's the leader of to not vote for this Secy of Treasury.
Yavin4
Feb 2025
#94
No he is not on the list of people who voted to confirm the Secy of the Treasury
Lulu KC
Feb 2025
#92
Because the senate democratic caucus leaders insist that normal processes apply.
Voltaire2
Feb 2025
#31
I think it's better that they distinguish between qualified nominees like Bessent and nutcases like RFk.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#83
I think it's better that they refuse to vote for any Trump nominee. At all. Do not help the Republican majority. Period.
ancianita
Feb 2025
#96
The OP is about the consequence of 16 senators' votes, and so indirectly true.
ancianita
Feb 2025
#147
No, it's false, plain and simple. "Indirectly true" sounds like a Trumpism. We're better than that. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#153
That's your opinion. It doesn't change the fact that the title of the OP was false. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#145
How can you say he's qualified when he immediately opened the system to a non elected
questionseverything
Feb 2025
#142
His qualifications were based on his HISTORY, not his decisions going forward. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#146
Agree. Misleading titles are not helpful, even if clarified in the body of the post. nt
Susan Calvin
Feb 2025
#112
It is false because they did not vote to give Bessent that authorization. No Treasury Secretary has ever
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#154
That's false. They recognize the difference between a nominee with deep experience, even if he's conservative,
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#130
It's not real. There was no vote to give the Musk team access to the Treasury payment system. N/T
lapucelle
Feb 2025
#163
What benefit do you see in an OP title that is false? Are you assuming DUers can't read and think? nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#84
I don't think we have time to pretend that Dem Senators are oblivious to what is happening.
Think. Again.
Feb 2025
#128
Not that I think any Democrat should vote for any Trump nominee. I don't.
Susan Calvin
Feb 2025
#115
I'd say primarying any Dem that DOES vote "yes" to anything from the right is probably a 'must do' right now.
Think. Again.
Feb 2025
#151
This headline is misleading. There has not been a vote approving Musk for anything.
33taw
Feb 2025
#3
It depends. If the person who they confirmed as treasury secretary gave every indication that he would be a proxy for
JohnSJ
Feb 2025
#41
Are you seriously comparing Hillary Clinton to the likes of woman-abuser and drunk Hegseth,
FoxNewsSucks
Feb 2025
#105
There's one thing here I always read. I suggest others in this thread do the same. n/t
rzemanfl
Feb 2025
#108
That nominee didn't say he'd let Musk do that. This would have happened under anyone Trump appointed.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#49
The nominee had deep financial experience and isn't a nutcase like some of the others.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#59
We don't need to send that message to Dumpy. It's the voters we need to keep in mind. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#73
I figured you were responding to the misleading title. Thanks for responding! nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#53
This Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent position on tariffs should disqualify him. He seems like something like Peter
JohnSJ
Feb 2025
#57
Apparently though they did not vote for eloon to have access...they voted to confirm
Meowmee
Feb 2025
#62
Timothy Kaine--D Virginia, Hillary's running mate in '16 zzzzzzz. Wasn't he just being hailed for doing something?
elocs
Feb 2025
#69
Damn it! Dem Senators voted to confirm the Treasury Secretary and that is NOT the same
Earthrise
Feb 2025
#82
Do you really think they knew that Musk would attack these agencies and steal their data?
patphil
Feb 2025
#156
I agree, we don't need this kind of stuff right now! They want us fighting each other with bad information like this.
redstatebluegirl
Feb 2025
#107
Anyone who thinks that you're gonna get a better nominee than that from Trump is crazy.
Wiz Imp
Feb 2025
#167