Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 16 Dem Senators Voted To Give Musk Team Access To Treasury Payment System [View all]Wiz Imp
(9,814 posts)167. Anyone who thinks that you're gonna get a better nominee than that from Trump is crazy.
She's definitely more qualified than just about any other Trump nominee and not a MAGA nutcase . Elizabeth Warren has already voiced support for her. I certainly hope she is confirmed as should all Democrats because if she isn't, the next choice will be someone like Eugene Scalia. He is the kind of monster you cam expect as an alternative to Chavez-DeRemer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Scalia
In 2019, The New York Times wrote that Scalia "is perhaps best known for his opposition to a regulation that would have mandated greater protections for workers at risk of repetitive stress injuries". The regulation was repealed by Congress in 2001.
During his career in private practice, Scalia has defended major corporations against financial and labor regulations.
Writing in The New Yorker, Eyal Press said: "as a corporate lawyer, Scalia has repeatedly hindered the efforts of workers to secure benefits or defend their rights." After leaving the Bush administration, he helped Wall Street firms oppose financial oversight and criticized banking regulations put in place under Obama.
Scalia argued for the plaintiffs in Wal-Mart v. Maryland in July 2006, which invalidated a state law under which large companies with at least 10,000 employees would have been required to spend at least 8% of their payroll on employee healthcare
During his tenure in the Department of Labor, he weakened some labor and employment protections, drawing criticism from organized labor leaders.
Janet Herold, an Obama-era career appointee to the Labor Department, spearheaded a number of employment discrimination lawsuits against major technology companies, including the Oracle Corporation. In 2019, Herold filed a complaint in which she alleged that Scalia had abused his authority by intervening to settle a 2017 Labor Department lawsuit in which Oracle was being investigated for allegedly underpaying women and people of color. Scalia encouraged a settlement figure between $17 million and $38 million, which Herold considered too low. Oracle went on to win the case, with the Department of Labor deciding not to appeal the decision. The Department of Labor dismissed Herold's complaint against Scalia, saying that Herold's "retaliation allegations rest on erroneous speculation regarding matters she is not in a position to know" and that Scalia had not participated in settlement discussions with Oracle. Herold was fired by Scalia in January 2021 after refusing to accept a transfer to a non-legal position.
During his career in private practice, Scalia has defended major corporations against financial and labor regulations.
Writing in The New Yorker, Eyal Press said: "as a corporate lawyer, Scalia has repeatedly hindered the efforts of workers to secure benefits or defend their rights." After leaving the Bush administration, he helped Wall Street firms oppose financial oversight and criticized banking regulations put in place under Obama.
Scalia argued for the plaintiffs in Wal-Mart v. Maryland in July 2006, which invalidated a state law under which large companies with at least 10,000 employees would have been required to spend at least 8% of their payroll on employee healthcare
During his tenure in the Department of Labor, he weakened some labor and employment protections, drawing criticism from organized labor leaders.
Janet Herold, an Obama-era career appointee to the Labor Department, spearheaded a number of employment discrimination lawsuits against major technology companies, including the Oracle Corporation. In 2019, Herold filed a complaint in which she alleged that Scalia had abused his authority by intervening to settle a 2017 Labor Department lawsuit in which Oracle was being investigated for allegedly underpaying women and people of color. Scalia encouraged a settlement figure between $17 million and $38 million, which Herold considered too low. Oracle went on to win the case, with the Department of Labor deciding not to appeal the decision. The Department of Labor dismissed Herold's complaint against Scalia, saying that Herold's "retaliation allegations rest on erroneous speculation regarding matters she is not in a position to know" and that Scalia had not participated in settlement discussions with Oracle. Herold was fired by Scalia in January 2021 after refusing to accept a transfer to a non-legal position.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
16 Dem Senators Voted To Give Musk Team Access To Treasury Payment System [View all]
Rendville
Feb 2025
OP
Be careful what you wish for. You may end up with a Senate with 75 or 80 Republicans.
Wiz Imp
Feb 2025
#114
He needed to prevent members of his caucus that he's the leader of to not vote for this Secy of Treasury.
Yavin4
Feb 2025
#94
No he is not on the list of people who voted to confirm the Secy of the Treasury
Lulu KC
Feb 2025
#92
Because the senate democratic caucus leaders insist that normal processes apply.
Voltaire2
Feb 2025
#31
I think it's better that they distinguish between qualified nominees like Bessent and nutcases like RFk.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#83
I think it's better that they refuse to vote for any Trump nominee. At all. Do not help the Republican majority. Period.
ancianita
Feb 2025
#96
The OP is about the consequence of 16 senators' votes, and so indirectly true.
ancianita
Feb 2025
#147
No, it's false, plain and simple. "Indirectly true" sounds like a Trumpism. We're better than that. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#153
That's your opinion. It doesn't change the fact that the title of the OP was false. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#145
How can you say he's qualified when he immediately opened the system to a non elected
questionseverything
Feb 2025
#142
His qualifications were based on his HISTORY, not his decisions going forward. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#146
Agree. Misleading titles are not helpful, even if clarified in the body of the post. nt
Susan Calvin
Feb 2025
#112
It is false because they did not vote to give Bessent that authorization. No Treasury Secretary has ever
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#154
That's false. They recognize the difference between a nominee with deep experience, even if he's conservative,
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#130
It's not real. There was no vote to give the Musk team access to the Treasury payment system. N/T
lapucelle
Feb 2025
#163
What benefit do you see in an OP title that is false? Are you assuming DUers can't read and think? nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#84
I don't think we have time to pretend that Dem Senators are oblivious to what is happening.
Think. Again.
Feb 2025
#128
Not that I think any Democrat should vote for any Trump nominee. I don't.
Susan Calvin
Feb 2025
#115
I'd say primarying any Dem that DOES vote "yes" to anything from the right is probably a 'must do' right now.
Think. Again.
Feb 2025
#151
This headline is misleading. There has not been a vote approving Musk for anything.
33taw
Feb 2025
#3
It depends. If the person who they confirmed as treasury secretary gave every indication that he would be a proxy for
JohnSJ
Feb 2025
#41
Are you seriously comparing Hillary Clinton to the likes of woman-abuser and drunk Hegseth,
FoxNewsSucks
Feb 2025
#105
There's one thing here I always read. I suggest others in this thread do the same. n/t
rzemanfl
Feb 2025
#108
That nominee didn't say he'd let Musk do that. This would have happened under anyone Trump appointed.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#49
The nominee had deep financial experience and isn't a nutcase like some of the others.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#59
We don't need to send that message to Dumpy. It's the voters we need to keep in mind. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#73
I figured you were responding to the misleading title. Thanks for responding! nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#53
This Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent position on tariffs should disqualify him. He seems like something like Peter
JohnSJ
Feb 2025
#57
Apparently though they did not vote for eloon to have access...they voted to confirm
Meowmee
Feb 2025
#62
Timothy Kaine--D Virginia, Hillary's running mate in '16 zzzzzzz. Wasn't he just being hailed for doing something?
elocs
Feb 2025
#69
Damn it! Dem Senators voted to confirm the Treasury Secretary and that is NOT the same
Earthrise
Feb 2025
#82
Do you really think they knew that Musk would attack these agencies and steal their data?
patphil
Feb 2025
#156
I agree, we don't need this kind of stuff right now! They want us fighting each other with bad information like this.
redstatebluegirl
Feb 2025
#107
Anyone who thinks that you're gonna get a better nominee than that from Trump is crazy.
Wiz Imp
Feb 2025
#167