General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lots of blame for the Mother. Apparently Dad's off the hook , though, [View all]TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)to anyone as a youth or as an adult so I'm betting that there are no sealed juvenile records that show he had any violent altercations either. Surely with the significance of the incident if there was some violent altercation he was arrested for there would be all kinds of people coming out of the woodwork to talk all about it particularly the victim of some speculated youthful arrest for something violent he was speculated for being guilty of without a single shred of any evidence pointing to any such thing. Hell, people who didn't know this family existed at all are being interviewed with one dingaling disturbed by the fact that he just didn't know them at all. I don't know any place of that town's size where it's reasonable to believe that everyone actually does know everyone else and finding something disturbing in that. Although what's more disturbing is the media believed his total lack of knowledge of the the very existence of the family was someone significant to interview in the first place. Hey, why didn't they interview me! I not only never knew this family existed but never knew the town existed either!
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Giving significance for something that is not known to exist and which there has never been any indication of in the first place as a reason to demonize his family for not knowing he was a dangerous homicidal maniac. That's just flat out stupid. There's just no common sense in that. None whatsoever.