Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapucelle

(20,958 posts)
62. It appears that there was not a quorum on the Senate floor when Scott initially called for unanimous consent.
Sun Sep 21, 2025, 02:48 PM
Sep 2025

That means that either all the of Democrats and some of the Republicans were not in the chamber or that some Democrats and some Republicans were not there. Either way, at least 51 senators appear to have skipped the shit show.

Senate rules presume a quorum in legislative session. Scott (R) ("notwithstanding rule XXII" ) was careful not to invoke cloture . At the end of his ridiculous speech, Tuberville (R), suggested the absence of a quorum (a procedural move), a roll call was ordered and then stopped when Lankford (R) asked for unanimous consent for the quorum call to be rescinded.

From the Congressional Record:

Mr. SCOTT of Florida: Mr. President, as if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. 403, which was submitted earlier today.

snip-------------------------------------------

Mr. Tuberville: I suggest the absence of a quorum.

The PRESIDING OFFICER: The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant executive clerk proceeded to call the roll.

Mr. LANKFORD: Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.[/b]

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.MORENO): Without objection, it is so ordered

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-153/senate-section/article/S6713-1

=================================

Voting and Quorum Procedures in the Senate

The Constitution states that "a Majority of each [House] shall constitute a quorum to do business." The Senate presumes that it is complying with this requirement and that a quorum is always present unless and until the absence of a quorum is suggested or demonstrated. This presumption allows the Senate to conduct its business on the floor with fewer than 51 Senators present until a Senator "suggests the absence of a quorum."

Except when the Senate has invoked cloture, the presiding officer may not count to determine if a quorum is present. When the absence of a quorum is suggested, therefore, the presiding officer directs the Clerk to call the roll. The Senate cannot resume its business until a majority of Senators respond to the quorum call or unless, by unanimous consent, "further proceedings under the quorum call are dispensed with" before the last Senator's name has been called. If a quorum fails to respond, the Senate may adjourn or take steps necessary to secure the attendance of enough Senators to constitute a quorum. It usually takes the latter course by agreeing to a motion that instructs the Sergeant at Arms to request the attendance of absent Senators.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/96-452

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I just saw that news and am sick to my stomach as well as in a very unforgiving mood. -eom vanessa_ca Sep 2025 #1
Post removed Post removed Sep 2025 #2
You've got to be kidding me. choie Sep 2025 #3
Would you give me Joseph Smith? Frasier Balzov Sep 2025 #4
"Gay people are a disease?" That guy? vanlassie Sep 2025 #5
I personally don't see a lot of good in Muhammad either fujiyamasan Sep 2025 #7
Martyred is the word. Frasier Balzov Sep 2025 #8
Glad to hear some Democrats choosing to lower tensions a bit, even though they know they'll be eaten and bashed. Silent Type Sep 2025 #6
Lower tensions? fujiyamasan Sep 2025 #9
So where is the base going? I think it was a smart move, but yeah some are going to bash them like Obama and Silent Type Sep 2025 #10
I'm totally in favor of resolutions condemning political violence fujiyamasan Sep 2025 #12
Neville Chamberlain dflprincess Sep 2025 #13
Taking your eye off the prize is a loser too. I'd much rather win House in midterms than bash Kirk and Dems Silent Type Sep 2025 #14
We don't have to bash Kirk but we don't have to legitimize the bigot either dflprincess Sep 2025 #20
When they go low we go high Alpeduez21 Sep 2025 #28
Who said anything about bashing Kirk? fujiyamasan Sep 2025 #55
2024 gave us Trump. We defeated Trump in 2020. bronxiteforever Sep 2025 #19
If trump had lost in 2016, he wouldn't have been elected in 2024. But thanks for comment. Silent Type Sep 2025 #30
The base is going to watch what we're doing right now, and use it as the basis for what we'll do in the future. Lancero Sep 2025 #67
What "appeal to the Right"? betsuni Sep 2025 #69
Just guessing... MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2025 #71
I just remembered Liz Cheney. Harris got cooties from Never Trumpers, for doing politics and using allies betsuni Sep 2025 #74
Love your exquisite sarcasm -eom vanessa_ca Sep 2025 #73
Kirk some_of_us_are_sane Sep 2025 #47
I agree, no one should be physically harmed for speech however repulsive fujiyamasan Sep 2025 #59
"UNANIMOUS Passage of Resolution Designating October 14th National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk" vanessa_ca Sep 2025 #11
In the Senate, but not the House. sl8 Sep 2025 #17
Nope Fiendish Thingy Sep 2025 #18
What are you talking about? Dems didn't "raise the tension." LuvLoogie Sep 2025 #23
Not willing to sacrifice anything, but yapping ain't gonna change anything and will cost us votes. Silent Type Sep 2025 #37
Who said anything about yapping? LuvLoogie Sep 2025 #40
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong! sheshe2 Sep 2025 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author Orrex Sep 2025 #27
Appeasment is not lowering any tensions quakerboy Sep 2025 #31
Yap away. Let me know how many new voters you attract. Silent Type Sep 2025 #38
OMG YoshidaYui Sep 2025 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author YoshidaYui Sep 2025 #16
Not Unanimous MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2025 #21
It was NOT "unanimous".. so the Cha Sep 2025 #22
It was unanimous in the Senate LearnedHand Sep 2025 #48
Did they vote? The Independents, too.. Sanders & Cha Sep 2025 #49
"Driving the news: Republicans voted unanimously to pass the resolution." Cha Sep 2025 #50
Scott asked for unanimous consent to proceed with consideration of the resolution. A quorum wasn't present. lapucelle Sep 2025 #72
I'll be observing by: ananda Sep 2025 #24
Well, let's just take Kirk Remembrance Day to actually remember who and what he was William Seger Sep 2025 #25
A great day to celebrate Freedom of Speech! TommyT139 Sep 2025 #33
By a year from November, when voting in the midterms... rubbersole Sep 2025 #26
It's a resolution, not legislation. It's non-binding. Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #29
If it's just a performative vote choie Sep 2025 #41
I think there is some confusion here. There was a resolution in the house and one in the Senate. Quiet Em Sep 2025 #43
Thanks Quiet Em choie Sep 2025 #61
It appears that there was not a quorum on the Senate floor when Scott initially called for unanimous consent. lapucelle Sep 2025 #62
As for the House resolution, Jamie Raskin voted YES and urged Democratic collegues to do the same. lapucelle Sep 2025 #63
Thank you. betsuni Sep 2025 #64
Although the original vote was a voice vote, Republican Andy Biggs made a motion for the roll to be called lapucelle Sep 2025 #65
The House resolution honored Kirk and called for an end to all political violence. The Senate reolution was different. lapucelle Sep 2025 #68
It can and will be weaponized against certain Democrats even though it is otherwise meaningless Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #46
the party isn't a monolith bigtree Sep 2025 #32
Why not a National Day of Remembrance... Woodycall Sep 2025 #34
🥱 yawn. QueerDuck Sep 2025 #35
A "no win" vote? choie Sep 2025 #42
A vote for or against was a no win situation for Democrats.. QueerDuck Sep 2025 #44
The resolution also called for an end to all political violence. Jamie Raskin recognized it as a trap. lapucelle Sep 2025 #70
The Day of Remembrance resolution was separate from the main resolution Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #36
It's a single day, not permanent Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #39
Senate Democrats did not vote unanimously for the Republican's Charlie Kirk Day stunt Quiet Em Sep 2025 #45
Thank you. It's politics. betsuni Sep 2025 #53
*rubs hands together, types furiously* OMG DEMOCRATS YOU PEOPLE ALLOWING FASCISM CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!111 betsuni Sep 2025 #51
Let them martyr. The Grand Illuminist Sep 2025 #52
Amazing how many knee jerked opinions before we found out that they did not vote for. Apologies anyone? Or delete your Srkdqltr Sep 2025 #54
Rule: Instantly assume the worst, assume the worst motivations, never ever give one second benefit of the doubt. betsuni Sep 2025 #56
Too true, sadly. Srkdqltr Sep 2025 #58
Yesterday someone posted an inaccurate headline from a right-wing, fake news, India-based website lapucelle Sep 2025 #66
Disgusting and extremely disappointing. n/t returnee Sep 2025 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All those DUers who claim...»Reply #62