Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

choie

(6,948 posts)

16. What are you talking about?

Reply to ForgedCrank (Reply #12)

Thu Oct 9, 2025, 09:36 PM

Oct 2025

If an unscrupulous prosecutor who is trunp’s puppet presents lies to the grand Jury, and there’s no presentation from the defense, (as is the case in the Grand Juryy) how are they supposed to make a just decision?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone want to pitch in on the Leticia James indictment? [View all] Baitball Blogger Oct 2025 OP

The Grand Jury only heard one side of the story (Trump's) and it didn't no_hypocrisy Oct 2025 #1

I hope Ms. James comes out with her side soon and loud. Baitball Blogger Oct 2025 #2

The motivation ForgedCrank Oct 2025 #12

What are you talking about? choie Oct 2025 #16

An indictment ForgedCrank Oct 2025 #18

Right so you think choie Oct 2025 #19

You are ForgedCrank Oct 2025 #20

I did not know that Grand Juries were presented with anonymous charges. maxsolomon Oct 2025 #3

Exactly. Otherwise, you might have jury nullification where the charges no_hypocrisy Oct 2025 #5

If I was on the Grand Jury I don't care who the charges are tied to, avebury Oct 2025 #9

As I understand it, there were two seperate grand juries GoCubsGo Oct 2025 #23

A federal grand jury backed the indictment on Comey as well. W_HAMILTON Oct 2025 #4

He wants her to drop his fines and charges. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #6

If Barbie wanna be Lawyer only presented the document avebury Oct 2025 #7

The indictment is actually related to a different purchase than the debunked 2023 "primary residence" accusation. pat_k Oct 2025 #11

The debunked case was related to a 2023 purchase. This is related to a 2020 purchase. Nevertheless, likely bullshit. pat_k Oct 2025 #8

thanks for the actual facts. WarGamer Oct 2025 #14

It was fannie mae Oldvet Oct 2025 #21

Ms James didn't get to be in her position by being careless of the facts. I actually heard a comment today Deuxcents Oct 2025 #10

Yes. I have little doubt the indictment is crap. See background on the charges and speculation in post 8. pat_k Oct 2025 #13

Has no legs and hopefully Halligan will soon be disbarred vapor2 Oct 2025 #15

grand jury indictments only have as much credibility as the prosecutor who makes the presentation to them bigtree Oct 2025 #17

I saw on MSNBC... Chemical Bill Oct 2025 #22