Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 12:17 PM Dec 2012

The Ownership Society in the Digital Age. [View all]

A thread floating around here on Netflix's changing TOS got me to thinking. It wasn't that long ago, perhaps twenty years or less, that when you bought something, it was yours. A book, a CD, a movie, even software. This was the Ownership Society. But as the Digital Age has changed many products from being physical, tangible goods into simple streams of 1's and 0's, we no longer own the things that we pay for.

Take books. With physical, paper books, once you bought it, you were free to do what you wished with it. You could lend it out, resell it to somebody else, stash it on your bookshelf for future reference, whatever, you owned it. Now, with ebooks, your options of what you can do with that book are quite limited. You can't resell it, you can lend it out for a limited period of time and only a limited number of times. Your book that you paid for, but don't really own, can even be repossessed by the original company for a variety of reasons.

The same applies with music and movies as well, in essence what you are paying for is an elaborate rental agreement, be it for movies, music, books, whatever that you download. You don't own those works, you are only renting them.

Now the Supreme Court, in the case of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons is deciding whether we will truly own physical things, ie printed books, CD's, a car, even a house. If the court uphold the lower court ruling, we're screwed. We will no longer truly own the things that we bought and paid for, be it books or furniture, music or tools, because if you truly own something, you can resell it.

We are becoming a renter society.

This has been coming on for awhile. Some of the first groundbreaking on this was done with long term car leasing, you know, nothing down, X amount of dollars per month for three years or such. When it first started, most people rightly said the leasing was a sucker's move. After all, if you went the leasing route, you would constantly making monthly car payments, have nothing tangible to show for those payments, and you would have to get another car in three years. Back in 1990, only seven percent of new cars were leased. Now almost a quarter of new cars are leased, and the only reason I figure is that the monthly lease rates are cheaper than monthly payments to own the car. That, and possibly the fact that we've now got consumers who are so fixated on new, bright and shiny objects that they are constantly going through new cars anyway.

Yet with leases, you don't have full control of your car. Maintenance is done when the company you're leasing from wants it done(this includes the infamous three thousand mile oil change, a totally unnecessary act that is wasteful and only profits the oil companies) and where they want it done, you can kiss off that great independent garage that has been in business for decades and does a great job cheap.

The same thing is happening in our food supply. Corporations like Monsanto exercise strict control of their genetically engineered seed and plants, where they can be planted, what can be used on them, even who can and cannot buy them. Heaven forbid if you farm next door to somebody growing a Monsanto GE crop. If it cross pollinates with yours, your crop is now forfeited to Monsanto, thanks to various patent laws.

Meanwhile, the Ownership Society is even continuing to slip away from the market that coined the term, housing. After decades of relative stability, the housing recession has driven millions into becoming renters. The percentage of homeowners has dropped into the basement, but this foreclosure crisis only accelerated a long term decline in home ownership, a decline that started a couple of decades ago.

What this means is that we're becoming a nation of tenants, depending on corporations for our shelter, our food, not even owning the clothes on our back. We are, in essence, reverting back to a feudal society, only instead of being ruled by kings and emperors, we're being ruled by corporations, the same corporations who are the lease holders on our food, shelter, transportation, oh, and employ us as well.

How long before we wake up and realize that we're living in a New Feudal Age? How long before we recognize that we own nothing?

Probably closer than you think unless we start acting now.

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's the fault of the liberal and the social democratic left... leftlibdem420 Dec 2012 #1
Made me think. Well done. k&r n/t Laelth Dec 2012 #2
Too many ifs, buts and maybes in that article dipsydoodle Dec 2012 #3
It might not be so bad. PopeOxycontinI Dec 2012 #4
I think that books are just simply getting into the digital age late Promethean Dec 2012 #12
I just got a Kindle, but I wouldn't waste money on a download duffyduff Dec 2012 #33
"Renting books, songs, movies" musiclawyer Dec 2012 #5
CDs still exist because people want the physical copy, plus duffyduff Dec 2012 #34
Recommended me b zola Dec 2012 #6
I'm doing my best not to support this renewal of feudalism. hunter Dec 2012 #7
We are a lot closer to a feudalistic society than most people know. zeemike Dec 2012 #8
K&R! We don't even have representative government anymore. We cannot compete with the wash Dustlawyer Dec 2012 #9
I am. I was exhausted after the election, but I'm getting my wind back. savannah43 Dec 2012 #17
We have not heard the last on the computer Dustlawyer Dec 2012 #25
Culture that is easily consumed is easily discarded. rrneck Dec 2012 #10
That is no lie nolabels Dec 2012 #11
Much fuming against copyright written by people who never create desirable music or art or fiction. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2012 #13
It seems like you have missed the point quakerboy Dec 2012 #27
I agree with you that you should be able to resell or give away your copy. nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2012 #32
kr. back in the 90s i read some business exec type laying out exactly this as a business plan. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #14
Restrictions on hard copy book sales dipsydoodle Dec 2012 #16
i meant renting everything & owning nothing outright. sorry you couldn't grasp that. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #18
I wasn't referring to you. dipsydoodle Dec 2012 #19
not sure why you responded to my post then -- with a personal dig. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #22
I will give up my books lastlib Dec 2012 #15
+1,000 duffyduff Dec 2012 #35
Home ownership & car ownership have bit something of an illusion for quite a while. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #20
It has been that way forever, and the illusion ProSense Dec 2012 #23
Till that final payment is made quakerboy Dec 2012 #28
Better than communism- where the government owns everything... WhoIsNumberNone Dec 2012 #21
This is really not all that new, just an extension. Stonepounder Dec 2012 #24
Shows the concept of property is amorphous, and evolves over time... limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #26
K&R We are a nation of farm animals for profit. woo me with science Dec 2012 #29
THis is called corporatism, or fascism Doctor_J Dec 2012 #30
That's what really gets me about ebooks, downloads, etc. duffyduff Dec 2012 #31
Kick woo me with science Dec 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Ownership Society in ...